Conjecture on multiplicative-order scarcity and exponential-sum cancellation

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let b≥2b\geq 2 be an integer. For every qq coprime to bb, let Oq(b)O_q(b) be the multiplicative order of bb modulo qq, and let Zq∗\mathbb{Z}_q^* denote the group of invertible residue classes modulo qq. For a function f:N→R+f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}_+, write oq→+∞(1)o_{q\to+\infty}(1) for a quantity tending to zero as q→+∞q\to+\infty.

Exponential-sum and small-order conjecture. There exists a non-increasing mapping f:N→R+f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}_+ such that:

  1. For every q∈Nq\in\mathbb{N} with q∧b=1q\wedge b=1, if Oq(b)≥qf(q)O_q(b)\geq q^{f(q)}, then
∣max⁡p∈Zq∗∑0≤k≤Oq(b)−1exp⁡(2iπpbkq)∣≤Oq(b)oq→+∞(1).\left|\max_{p\in\mathbb{Z}_q^*}\sum_{0\leq k\leq O_q(b)-1}\exp\left(2i\pi\frac{pb^k}{q}\right)\right|\leq O_q(b)o_{q\to +\infty}(1).
  1. One has
lim⁡x→+∞log⁡#{1≤q≤x,q∧b=1:Oq(b)≤qf(q)}log⁡x=0.\lim_{x\to +\infty}\frac{\log\#\{1\leq q\leq x,q\wedge b=1:O_q(b)\leq q^{f(q)}\}}{\log x}=0.

This conjecture is intended to provide the equidistribution input needed for the paper's discussion of Mahler's problem: sufficiently large multiplicative order should yield cancellation in the associated exponential sums, while moduli with smaller order should be sparse. The source provides no resolution status.

References

Primary source

Edouard Daviaud, “Intrinsic Diophantine approximation by rationals of height with a bounded number of distinct prime factors”, arXiv:2602.02379 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.