Conjecture on multiplicative-order scarcity and exponential-sum cancellation

Let b2b\geq 2 be an integer. For every qq coprime to bb, let Oq(b)O_q(b) be the multiplicative order of bb modulo qq, and let Zq\mathbb{Z}_q^* denote the group of invertible residue classes modulo qq. For a function f:NR+f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}_+, write oq+(1)o_{q\to+\infty}(1) for a quantity tending to zero as q+q\to+\infty.

Exponential-sum and small-order conjecture. There exists a non-increasing mapping f:NR+f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}_+ such that:

  1. For every qNq\in\mathbb{N} with qb=1q\wedge b=1, if Oq(b)qf(q)O_q(b)\geq q^{f(q)}, then
maxpZq0kOq(b)1exp(2iπpbkq)Oq(b)oq+(1).\left|\max_{p\in\mathbb{Z}_q^*}\sum_{0\leq k\leq O_q(b)-1}\exp\left(2i\pi\frac{pb^k}{q}\right)\right|\leq O_q(b)o_{q\to +\infty}(1).
  1. One has
limx+log#{1qx,qb=1:Oq(b)qf(q)}logx=0.\lim_{x\to +\infty}\frac{\log\#\{1\leq q\leq x,q\wedge b=1:O_q(b)\leq q^{f(q)}\}}{\log x}=0.

This conjecture is intended to provide the equidistribution input needed for the paper's discussion of Mahler's problem: sufficiently large multiplicative order should yield cancellation in the associated exponential sums, while moduli with smaller order should be sparse. The source provides no resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Edouard Daviaud, “Intrinsic Diophantine approximation by rationals of height with a bounded number of distinct prime factors”, arXiv:2602.02379 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.