Distinguished representations and the moment map conjecture

From papers

Let π\pi be an irreducible representation of GG with πI0\pi^I\ne0, and let (t,n,χ)(t,n,\chi) be its Deligne–Langlands parameter. Let Z(π)Z(\pi) denote the Aubert–Zelevinsky dual, let Z(π)Z(\pi)^\vee be its smooth dual, and set

a=(t,qr)G×C×.a=(t,\sqrt{q_r})\in G^\vee\times\mathbb{C}^\times.

Using a Killing form to identify g\mathfrak{g}^\vee with g\mathfrak{g}^{\vee *}, regard nn as an element of g\mathfrak{g}^{\vee *}. Let MM^\vee be the hyperspherical dual with moment map

μ:Mg.\mu:M^\vee\to\mathfrak{g}^{\vee *}.

Distinguished-representation moment map conjecture. If Z(π)Z(\pi)^\vee is XX-distinguished, then

(M)a0(M^\vee)^a\ne0

and n(g)an\in(\mathfrak{g}^{\vee *})^a lies in the image of

μ:(M)a(g)a.\mu:(M^\vee)^a\to(\mathfrak{g}^{\vee *})^a.

This predicts a geometric necessary condition on the Deligne–Langlands parameter of a distinguished representation; the source gives no resolution.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Guy Shtotland, “Relative Kazhdan Lusztig isomorphism for GL_2n/Sp_2n”, arXiv:2601.22846 (2026).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.