Generalised Euclid–Mullin conjecture

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let a,m∈Na,m\in\mathbb{N} satisfy

a2≡1(modm).a^2\equiv1\pmod{m}.

Let GEM⁡(a,m)\operatorname{GEM}(a,m) be the class of polynomials introduced in the paper, and let GEM⁡1(f;a,m)\operatorname{GEM}_1(f;a,m) and GEM⁡2(f;a,m)\operatorname{GEM}_2(f;a,m) denote the first and second generalised Euclid–Mullin sequences associated to f∈GEM⁡(a,m)f\in\operatorname{GEM}(a,m), obtained by choosing the smallest and largest eligible prime, respectively. Generalised Euclid–Mullin conjecture. (i) There exists f∈GEM⁡(a,m)f\in\operatorname{GEM}(a,m) such that GEM⁡1(f;a,m)\operatorname{GEM}_1(f;a,m) contains every prime p≡a(modm)p\equiv a\pmod{m}. (ii) For every f∈GEM⁡(a,m)f\in\operatorname{GEM}(a,m), GEM⁡2(f;a,m)\operatorname{GEM}_2(f;a,m) omits infinitely many primes p≡a(modm)p\equiv a\pmod{m}. The conjecture generalises the expected behaviour of Mullin's original sequences in prescribed arithmetic progressions. The supplied text does not establish either assertion or provide a resolution status beyond presenting them as conjectures.

References

Primary source

Andrew R. Booker and Omri Simon, “A generalisation of the Euclid-Mullin sequences”, arXiv:2601.21901 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.