The one-step geometric wavefront set speculation for positive-real representations

From papers

Let π(s,u,τ)Irrι(G)I\pi(s,u,\tau)\in {\rm Irr}_\iota(\overline{G})^I be such that ss is positive real. Write dBV,G(n)d^{(n)}_{BV,G} for the relevant Barbasch–Vogan duality map and Ou\mathcal{O}_u^\vee for the nilpotent orbit associated with π(s,u,τ)\pi(s,u,\tau). Let Im(dBV,G(n))\operatorname{Im}(d^{(n)}_{BV,G}) denote its image, ordered by the orbit closure order.

One-step geometric wavefront set speculation. Either

WFgeo(AZ(π(s,u,τ)))=dBV,G(n)(Ou),{\rm WF}^{\rm geo}(\operatorname{AZ}(\pi(s,u,\tau)))=d^{(n)}_{BV,G}(\mathcal{O}_u^\vee),

or WFgeo(AZ(π(s,u,τ))){\rm WF}^{\rm geo}(\operatorname{AZ}(\pi(s,u,\tau))) is equal to a maximal orbit in

{OIm(dBV,G(n)):O<dBV,G(n)(Ou)}.\left\{\mathcal{O}\in\operatorname{Im}(d^{(n)}_{BV,G}):\mathcal{O}<d^{(n)}_{BV,G}(\mathcal{O}_u^\vee)\right\}.

Thus the geometric wavefront set is at most one step smaller than dBV,G(n)(Ou)d^{(n)}_{BV,G}(\mathcal{O}_u^\vee) within the image of dBV,G(n)d^{(n)}_{BV,G}. The speculation is motivated by numerical evidence and follows a discussion of examples where the geometric wavefront set can be smaller than the Barbasch–Vogan prediction; its general validity remains open.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Fan Gao and Runze Wang, “Geometric wavefront sets of genuine Iwahori-spherical representations”, arXiv:2601.15670 (2026).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.