The converse to the surplus condition criterion for point configurations

From papers

Let r,nr,n be integers, let [n]={1,,n}[n]=\{1,\ldots,n\}, and let I=(I1,,Ik)\mathcal{I}=(I_1,\ldots,I_k) be a collection of subsets of [n][n]. Let dr,n(I)d_{r,n}(\mathcal{I}) denote the degree associated with the forgetful map for this collection, and say that I\mathcal{I} satisfies the surplus condition when, for every nonempty subset J[k]J\subseteq [k], one has

jJIjJ+r+1.\left|\bigcup_{j\in J}I_j\right|\geq |J|+r+1.

The converse to the surplus condition criterion. One has

dr,n(I)0d_{r,n}(\mathcal{I})\neq 0

if and only if I\mathcal{I} satisfies the surplus condition.

The proposition preceding this conjecture proves the forward implication from nonzero degree to the surplus condition. The conjecture asserts the converse, namely that the surplus condition is also sufficient for nonvanishing of the degree.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Alex Fink, Navid Nabijou and Rob Silversmith, “Counting point configurations in projective space”, arXiv:2601.15421 (2026).

Additional references

3 papers in this index state this conjecture (2024–2026). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2410.01682, arXiv:2409.15504.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.