Chevalley restriction conjecture for commuting schemes

Let kk be a field of characteristic 00, let GG be a reductive algebraic group over kk with Lie algebra g\mathfrak g, and fix a maximal torus TGT\subset G with Lie algebra t\mathfrak t and Weyl group WW. For nNn\in\mathbb N, let

Cgn={(x1,,xn)gn  [xi,xj]=0 for all 1i,jn}\mathfrak C_{\mathfrak g}^n=\Bigl\{(x_1,\dots,x_n)\in\mathfrak g^n\ \big|\ [x_i,x_j]=0\text{ for all }1\le i,j\le n\Bigr\}

be the nn-fold commuting scheme, and write Cgn\sslashG=Spec(k[Cgn]G)\mathfrak C_{\mathfrak g}^n\sslash G=\operatorname{Spec}\left(k[\mathfrak C_{\mathfrak g}^n]^G\right). The inclusion tg\mathfrak t\hookrightarrow\mathfrak g induces

ϑ:k[Cgn]Gk[tn]W.\vartheta:k[\mathfrak C_{\mathfrak g}^n]^G\longrightarrow k[\mathfrak t^n]^W.

Chevalley restriction conjecture for commuting schemes. The morphism ϑ\vartheta is an isomorphism. This asserts that invariant functions on commuting nn-tuples are completely determined by restriction to tuples in a fixed maximal torus. The claim concerns the invariant-theoretic structure of commuting schemes and remains unresolved here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Rudrendra Kashyap and Ruoxi Li, “Invariant Algebraic D-Modules on Connected Reductive Groups”, arXiv:2601.10934 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.