Filtration monotonicity under refinement for canonical relation lattices

Let NN be the common lattice of a fan Σ\Sigma and its subdivision Σ\Sigma', with Σ(1)Σ(1)\Sigma(1)\subseteq\Sigma'(1). Write Lrel(Σ)L_{\mathrm{rel}}(\Sigma) and Lrel(Σ)L_{\mathrm{rel}}(\Sigma') for their relation lattices, and let

j:Lrel(Σ)Lrel(Σ)j:L_{\mathrm{rel}}(\Sigma)\hookrightarrow L_{\mathrm{rel}}(\Sigma')

be the natural injection induced by ZΣ(1)ZΣ(1)\mathbb{Z}^{\Sigma(1)}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{Z}^{\Sigma'(1)}. For 0rLrel(Σ)0\neq r\in L_{\mathrm{rel}}(\Sigma), define its filtration depth by

depthΣ(r):=min{krFkLrel(Σ)}.\operatorname{depth}_\Sigma(r):=\min\{k\mid r\in F_kL_{\mathrm{rel}}(\Sigma)\}.

Filtration monotonicity under refinement. One has

depthΣ(j(r))depthΣ(r).\operatorname{depth}_{\Sigma'}(j(r))\le \operatorname{depth}_{\Sigma}(r).

Equivalently, subdivision can only preserve or lower the minimal filtration level needed to express a relation using star-supported generators. This predicts that refinement does not make relations more complicated with respect to the star-support filtration; whether the assertion holds in full generality remains open in the supplied source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Rizwan Jahangir and Daisuke Ishii, “Canonical Lattices of Integer Relations Associated to Rational Fans: Wall Generation and a Two-Step Support Filtration”, arXiv:2601.05678 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.