Factorization conjecture for derivative embeddings

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let π∈Irrρ\pi\in\mathrm{Irr}_{\rho}, let n∈Multρ\mathfrak n\in\mathrm{Mult}_{\rho} be minimal to π\pi, and let h=hd(π)\mathfrak h=\mathfrak{hd}(\pi). Set l1=labs(n)l_1=l_{\mathrm{abs}}(\mathfrak n) and l2=labs(hd(π))−labs(n)l_2=l_{\mathrm{abs}}(\mathfrak{hd}(\pi))-l_{\mathrm{abs}}(\mathfrak n). Let DhD_{\mathfrak h} and DnD_{\mathfrak n} denote the corresponding derivatives, let λ~\widetilde{\lambda} denote co-standard representations, let r(n,π)\mathfrak r(\mathfrak n,\pi) be the removal multisegment, and let Na,bN_{a,b} and Na,b,cN_{a,b,c} denote the unipotent radicals of the indicated parabolics. Assume the minimal-model conjecture and the multisegment embedding conjecture hold, so that the maps ι1\iota_1, ι2\iota_2, and ι3\iota_3 in the displayed diagram are defined by the stated embeddings.

Factorization conjecture. The composite ι2∘ι1\iota_2\circ\iota_1 factors through ι3\iota_3.

This conjecture predicts compatibility between the minimal-model and multisegment embedding constructions. It is conditional on the two conjectures named in the source, whose status is not resolved in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Kei Yuen Chan, “Construction of simple quotients of Bernstein-Zelevinsky derivatives and highest derivative multisegments III: properties of minimal sequences”, arXiv:2601.00674 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.