Inverse-image conjecture for the drop 1 operator and the Hoffman subring

Let H=Zx,y\mathcal{H}=\mathbb{Z}\langle x,y\rangle, let H0=Z+yHx\mathcal{H}^0=\mathbb{Z}+y\mathcal{H}x, let H2,3=Zz2,z3\mathcal{H}^{2,3}=\mathbb{Z}\langle z_2,z_3\rangle with zk=yxk1z_k=yx^{k-1}, and let τ\tau be the anti-automorphism defined by τ(x)=y\tau(x)=y and τ(y)=x\tau(y)=x. Let D ⁣:H0H2\mathcal{D}\colon\mathcal{H}^0\to\mathcal{H}^{\geq 2} be the drop 1 operator.

Inverse-image conjecture. For any word ww in H0\mathcal{H}^0 that cannot be written in the form w1τ(w2)w_1\tau(w_2) for words w1,w2w_1,w_2 in H2,3\mathcal{H}^{2,3}, we have

D(w)H2,3.\mathcal{D}(w)\notin\mathcal{H}^{2,3}.

This conjecture characterizes, in one direction, which words can have drop 1 images in the subring generated by z2z_2 and z3z_3. The paper presents it in relation to the main result and does not give a proof or resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Shin-ichiro Seki, “Diamond lift of Hirose–Sato's formula involving the Hoffman basis”, arXiv:2512.23668 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.