Universal bound conjecture for Gaussian entropic optimal transport

About 1 year old · traced to

Let A,B⊳0\boldsymbol{A},\boldsymbol{B}\rhd 0 be positive-definite covariance operators on H=Rd\mathcal{H}=\mathbb{R}^{d}, and let πε\pi_{\varepsilon} and π0\pi_{0} denote the entropic and unregularized optimal transport couplings, respectively. Universal bound conjecture. There exists a dimension-dependent constant Cd>0C_{d}>0 such that

lim sup⁡ε↓0W22(πε,π0)ε≤Cd\limsup_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0}\frac{\mathcal{W}_{2}^{2}(\pi_{\varepsilon},\pi_{0})}{\varepsilon}\le C_{d}

for all \mathbfboldsymbolA,\mathbfboldsymbolB⊳0\mathbfboldsymbol{A},\mathbfboldsymbol{B}\rhd 0. The asymptotic scaling is already guaranteed in the non-degenerate finite-dimensional setting. The identity case \mathbfboldsymbolA=\mathbfboldsymbolB\mathbfboldsymbol{A}=\mathbfboldsymbol{B} gives Cd≥d/2C_{d}\ge d/2, while numerical experiments suggest rates near 0.36d0.36d for random full-rank covariances; it remains open whether the identity case is the worst case or whether the smaller observed rates reflect concentration in random matrix ensembles.

References

Primary source

Ho Yun, “Spectral Shrinkage of Gaussian Entropic Optimal Transport”, arXiv:2512.19457 (2026).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A reader-submitted proof claims the conjecture is settled with the sharp constant, but no independent confirmation was found.

Ho Yun (2025) formulated the conjecture for Gaussian entropic transport and left the dimension-only bound open. The question is whether the small-regularization error can be bounded uniformly over all positive-definite covariance pairs.

Known results

  • Ho Yun (2025): finite-dimensional nondegenerate pairs satisfy W22(πε,π0)=O(ε)\mathcal{W}_2^2(\pi_\varepsilon,\pi_0)=O(\varepsilon).
  • Ho Yun (2025): the identity case gives Cd≥d/2C_d\ge d/2.
  • Ho Yun (2025): random full-rank experiments suggest rates near 0.36d0.36d, leaving the worst case unresolved.

August 26, 2026 community submission (unverified)

A submitted proof argues that the exact limit is tr⁡(T(I+T2)−1)≤d/2\operatorname{tr}(T(I+T^2)^{-1})\le d/2, with equality exactly when A=BA=B, and therefore claims the sharp constant Cd=d/2C_d=d/2 without a commutativity assumption. This argument has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture remains unverified; a community submission claims Cd=d/2C_d=d/2, while the previously published record still treats the universal bound as open.

Sources

Solutions 2

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

The sharp universal constant is d/2d/2

Let A,B∈Rd×dA,B\in\mathbb R^{d\times d} be positive definite. Let πε\pi_\varepsilon be the Gaussian entropic optimal coupling, with precisely the regularization parameter ε\varepsilon used in the cited paper, and let π0\pi_0 be the ordinary optimal Gaussian coupling.

Define the unique positive-definite optimal transport map

T=A−1/2(A1/2BA1/2)1/2A−1/2,TAT=B.T=A^{-1/2}(A^{1/2}BA^{1/2})^{1/2}A^{-1/2}, \qquad TAT=B.

We prove the exact asymptotic identity

lim⁡ε↓0W22(πε,π0)ε=tr⁡ ⁣(T(I+T2)−1)=∑j=1dtj1+tj2≤d2,\boxed{\displaystyle \lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow0} \frac{\mathcal W_2^2(\pi_\varepsilon,\pi_0)}{\varepsilon} =\operatorname{tr}\!\left(T(I+T^2)^{-1}\right) =\sum_{j=1}^d\frac{t_j}{1+t_j^2} \leq\frac d2,}

where t1,…,td>0t_1,\ldots,t_d>0 are the eigenvalues of TT. Equality holds if and only if A=BA=B. Consequently, the optimal universal constant in Conjecture 3.1 is

Cd=d2.C_d=\frac d2.

No commutativity assumption on AA and BB is required.

Properly aligned factors and the exact coupling formula

Choose invertible properly aligned factors G,MG,M of the two covariance matrices:

A=GG∗,B=MM∗,K=G∗M=M∗G≻0.A=GG^*,\qquad B=MM^*,\qquad K=G^*M=M^*G\succ0.

For example, take G=A1/2G=A^{1/2} and M=TA1/2M=TA^{1/2}. Then

G∗M=A1/2TA1/2=(A1/2BA1/2)1/2≻0.G^*M=A^{1/2}TA^{1/2} =(A^{1/2}BA^{1/2})^{1/2}\succ0.

Introduce the positive-definite matrices

C=G∗G,D=M∗M,S=C+D.C=G^*G,\qquad D=M^*M,\qquad S=C+D.

The source's Theorem 3.4 gives the entropic correlation operator

Rε=fε(K),fε(x)=2x4x2+ε2+ε=4x2+ε2−ε2x(x>0).R_\varepsilon=f_\varepsilon(K), \qquad f_\varepsilon(x) =\frac{2x}{\sqrt{4x^2+\varepsilon^2}+\varepsilon} =\frac{\sqrt{4x^2+\varepsilon^2}-\varepsilon}{2x} \quad(x>0).

By Theorem 3.10 of the same source,

W22(πε,π0)=2tr⁡ ⁣(S−Qε1/2),\mathcal W_2^2(\pi_\varepsilon,\pi_0) =2\operatorname{tr}\!\left(S-Q_\varepsilon^{1/2}\right),

where

Qε=C2+D2+CRεD+DRεC.Q_\varepsilon =C^2+D^2+CR_\varepsilon D+DR_\varepsilon C.

Although π0\pi_0 has singular covariance on R2d\mathbb R^{2d}, the matrix being differentiated below is Q0=S2≻0Q_0=S^2\succ0, so its positive square root is smooth.

The cancellation that removes all covariance dependence

Proper alignment implies

M=G−∗K,D=M∗M=KC−1K.M=G^{-*}K, \qquad D=M^*M=KC^{-1}K.

In particular,

CK−1D=K,DK−1C=K.CK^{-1}D=K, \qquad DK^{-1}C=K.

Since K≻0K\succ0, the scalar formula for fεf_\varepsilon, applied through the spectral calculus, gives

Rε=I−ε2K−1+O(ε2).R_\varepsilon =I-\frac{\varepsilon}{2}K^{-1} +O(\varepsilon^2).

Substitution into the exact coupling formula therefore yields

Qε=C2+D2+CD+DC−ε2(CK−1D+DK−1C)+O(ε2)=S2−εK+O(ε2).\begin{aligned} Q_\varepsilon &=C^2+D^2+CD+DC -\frac{\varepsilon}{2} \left(CK^{-1}D+DK^{-1}C\right) +O(\varepsilon^2)\\ &=S^2-\varepsilon K+O(\varepsilon^2). \end{aligned}

Write

Qε1/2=S+εL+O(ε2).Q_\varepsilon^{1/2}=S+\varepsilon L+O(\varepsilon^2).

Squaring this expansion, without assuming that SS and LL commute, gives the Sylvester equation

SL+LS=−K.SL+LS=-K.

Multiplication by S−1S^{-1} followed by cyclicity of the trace shows that

2tr⁡(L)=−tr⁡(S−1K).2\operatorname{tr}(L) =-\operatorname{tr}(S^{-1}K).

Hence

lim⁡ε↓0W22(πε,π0)ε=tr⁡(S−1K).\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow0} \frac{\mathcal W_2^2(\pi_\varepsilon,\pi_0)}{\varepsilon} =\operatorname{tr}(S^{-1}K).

Sharp bound, equality, and the transport-map formula

The aligned-factor identity gives the exact positive-semidefinite factorization

S−2K=C+KC−1K−2K=(C−K)C−1(C−K)⪰0.S-2K =C+KC^{-1}K-2K =(C-K)C^{-1}(C-K)\succeq0.

Thus

0≺S−1/2KS−1/2⪯12I,0\prec S^{-1/2}KS^{-1/2} \preceq\frac12I,

and consequently

tr⁡(S−1K)=tr⁡(S−1/2KS−1/2)≤d2.\operatorname{tr}(S^{-1}K) =\operatorname{tr}(S^{-1/2}KS^{-1/2}) \leq\frac d2.

Equality forces S=2KS=2K, hence C=KC=K, and then G∗M=G∗GG^*M=G^*G. Since GG is invertible, M=GM=G, so A=BA=B. Conversely, A=BA=B permits M=GM=G and attains d/2d/2.

Finally, proper alignment implies that

T=MG−1=T∗≻0,T=MG^{-1}=T^*\succ0,

and this is the unique positive-definite solution of TAT=BTAT=B. Therefore

K=G∗TG,S=G∗(I+T2)G.K=G^*TG, \qquad S=G^*(I+T^2)G.

Cyclicity of trace now gives the stronger intrinsic identity

tr⁡(S−1K)=tr⁡ ⁣((I+T2)−1T)=∑j=1dtj1+tj2.\operatorname{tr}(S^{-1}K) =\operatorname{tr}\!\left((I+T^2)^{-1}T\right) =\sum_{j=1}^d\frac{t_j}{1+t_j^2}.

The exact deficit from the extremal constant is

d2−lim⁡ε↓0W22(πε,π0)ε=12∑j=1d(tj−1)21+tj2.\frac d2- \lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow0} \frac{\mathcal W_2^2(\pi_\varepsilon,\pi_0)}{\varepsilon} =\frac12\sum_{j=1}^d\frac{(t_j-1)^2}{1+t_j^2}.

This proves the full universal-bound conjecture, determines its sharp constant, characterizes every equality case, and identifies the exact rate for all positive-definite covariance pairs. The spectral-shrinkage and coupling identities used above are Theorems 3.4 and 3.10 of Ho Yun, Spectral Shrinkage of Gaussian Entropic Optimal Transport, arXiv:2512.19457v2, where the universal-bound problem is stated as Conjecture 3.1.

This solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

The sharp universal Gaussian EOT coupling bound

Statement

Let A,B be positive-definite covariance matrices on R^d. Let pi_epsilon be their Gaussian entropic optimal-transport coupling and let pi_0 be the unregularized Gaussian optimal coupling. We prove that the limit in MathDB #372212 exists and satisfies

lim⁡ε↓0W22(πε,π0)ε≤d2.(1)\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow0} \frac{\mathcal W_2^2(\pi_\varepsilon,\pi_0)}{\varepsilon} \leq \frac d2. \tag{1}

The constant is sharp. In fact, equality holds exactly when A=B. Consequently the optimal universal constant is

Cd=d/2.\boxed{C_d=d/2}.

Throughout, epsilon has the normalization used by the source and by the MathDB statement: the entropic objective contains 2 epsilon KL. Rescaling that objective rescales the parameter and therefore the displayed constant.

Aligned square roots

Choose the canonical properly aligned Green operators G_0,M_0 used by Theorem 3.10 of the source, and abbreviate them to G,M, so

GG∗=A,MM∗=B,C:=G∗M=M∗G≻0.GG^*=A,\qquad MM^*=B,\qquad C:=G^*M=M^*G\succ0.

All three matrices are invertible because A and B are positive definite. Put

X=G∗G,Y=M∗M,S=X+Y.X=G^*G,\qquad Y=M^*M,\qquad S=X+Y.

From G^*M=C we have M=G^{-*}C, and therefore

Y=CX−1C.(2)Y=CX^{-1}C. \tag{2}

In particular,

XC−1Y=C,YC−1X=C.(3)XC^{-1}Y=C,\qquad YC^{-1}X=C. \tag{3}

Differentiate the exact distance formula

The source defines

Rε=fε(C),fε(t)=2t4t2+ε2+ε=4t2+ε2−ε2t.R_\varepsilon=f_\varepsilon(C),\qquad f_\varepsilon(t)= \frac{2t}{\sqrt{4t^2+\varepsilon^2}+\varepsilon} =\frac{\sqrt{4t^2+\varepsilon^2}-\varepsilon}{2t}.

Because the spectrum of C is bounded away from zero,

Rε=I−ε2C−1+O(ε2)(4)R_\varepsilon =I-\frac{\varepsilon}{2}C^{-1}+O(\varepsilon^2) \tag{4}

in operator norm. Theorem 3.10 gives

W22(πε,π0)=2tr⁡ ⁣(S−Qε),(5)\mathcal W_2^2(\pi_\varepsilon,\pi_0) =2\operatorname{tr}\!\left(S-\sqrt{Q_\varepsilon}\right), \tag{5}

where

Qε=X2+Y2+XRεY+YRεX.Q_\varepsilon =X^2+Y^2+XR_\varepsilon Y+YR_\varepsilon X.

Equations (3)--(4) now collapse the first-order perturbation:

Qε=S2−εC+O(ε2).(6)Q_\varepsilon =S^2-\varepsilon C+O(\varepsilon^2). \tag{6}

For completeness, if Q(t)=S^2+tH+O(t^2) and sqrt(Q(t))=S+tZ+O(t^2), differentiating the square gives the Sylvester equation

SZ+ZS=H.SZ+ZS=H.

Multiplication by S^{-1}, followed by cyclicity of trace, yields

tr⁡Z=12tr⁡(S−1H).(7)\operatorname{tr}Z =\frac12\operatorname{tr}(S^{-1}H). \tag{7}

Here S^2 is positive definite, so Q_epsilon remains positive definite near zero and its principal square root is Frechet differentiable there.

Applying (7) to (6), then differentiating (5), proves the exact formula

lim⁡ε↓0W22(πε,π0)ε=tr⁡(S−1C).(8)\boxed{ \lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow0} \frac{\mathcal W_2^2(\pi_\varepsilon,\pi_0)}{\varepsilon} =\operatorname{tr}(S^{-1}C). } \tag{8}

Thus the conjectured limsup is actually a limit.

The universal bound and equality case

Proper alignment supplies the decisive order relation:

S−2C=X+Y−G∗M−M∗G=(G−M)∗(G−M)⪰0.(9)S-2C =X+Y-G^*M-M^*G =(G-M)^*(G-M)\succeq0. \tag{9}

Conjugating (9) by S^{-1/2} gives

0≺S−1/2CS−1/2⪯12I.0\prec S^{-1/2}CS^{-1/2}\preceq\frac12I.

Taking traces and using cyclicity in (8),

tr⁡(S−1C)=tr⁡(S−1/2CS−1/2)≤d2,\operatorname{tr}(S^{-1}C) =\operatorname{tr}(S^{-1/2}CS^{-1/2})\leq\frac d2,

which proves (1).

If equality holds, the positive-semidefinite matrix I/2-S^{-1/2}CS^{-1/2} has trace zero, hence is zero. Therefore S=2C, and (9) forces G=M, so A=B. Conversely, when A=B we may take G=M; then (8) gives tr((2X)^{-1}X)=d/2. This also proves sharpness.

Verification scope

The proof above is finite-dimensional matrix analysis and does not depend on computation. The companion script reconstructs aligned roots for deterministic positive-definite test matrices, checks identities (2)--(3) and (9), and confirms that the exact finite-epsilon formula converges to (8), including the equality case.