Unified APD formula for row-shifted second-power lattices
Unified APD formula for row-shifted second-power lattices
Let be the permutation-sum function of the -th order row-shifted second-power lattice with positive integer shift , and define . Let be the core value
Unified row-shifted second-power lattice conjecture. For ,
The formula is presented as a reconstruction from the multiplication-table value and is not accompanied by a general proof.
Progress summary
A December 2025 preprint reports numerical support for the formula, but no general proof or counterexample has appeared.
The conjecture asserts that the alternating power difference has the stated closed form for every and positive integer shift . It appears in a December 2025 preprint as a conjecture, together with the associated claim that the first appearance degree is ; the source explicitly says rigorous proofs remain to be established.
December 2025 numerical confirmation
The preprint reports exact numerical checks, including the squared natural-square case for and an explicit check at . These computations support the formula but do not establish it for general and ; no retrieved source gives a proof, counterexample, refutation, or independent verification.
Current status (as of August 2026): Numerical cases are settled in the reported examples, but the unified formula and the associated first-appearance-degree claim remain unproved and open in general.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Kenichi Takemura, “Alternating Power Difference and Matrix Symmetry: Closed-Form Formulas for the First Appearance Degree m_1”, arXiv:2512.18169 (2025).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
For any matrix , the determinant expansion gives
Set . First consider the multiplication table . With , the Vandermonde determinant gives
Each factor satisfies . Since there are factors and
equation (1) yields
Now take the row-shifted second-power lattice
and put . Since
extracting row and column factors gives
Because
this determinant has exact vanishing order and leading coefficient
Therefore
Equivalently, if
then
These identities hold for every and every positive integer .