Unified APD formula for row-shifted second-power lattices

From papers

Let fd,2f_{d,2} be the permutation-sum function of the nn-th order row-shifted second-power lattice with positive integer shift dd, and define Tn1=n(n1)/2T_{n-1}=n(n-1)/2. Let VCore(n)V_{\text{Core}}(n) be the core value

VCore(n):=Tn1!k=1n1k!.V_{\text{Core}}(n):=T_{n-1}!\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Unified row-shifted second-power lattice conjecture. For n2n \geq 2,

APDTn1(fd,2)=(2d)Tn1VCore(n).\operatorname{APD}_{T_{n-1}}(f_{d,2})=(2d)^{T_{n-1}}V_{\text{Core}}(n).

The formula is presented as a reconstruction from the multiplication-table value and is not accompanied by a general proof.

Progress summary

Open

A December 2025 preprint reports numerical support for the formula, but no general proof or counterexample has appeared.

The conjecture asserts that the alternating power difference has the stated closed form for every n2n \ge 2 and positive integer shift dd. It appears in a December 2025 preprint as a conjecture, together with the associated claim that the first appearance degree is Tn1T_{n-1}; the source explicitly says rigorous proofs remain to be established.

December 2025 numerical confirmation

The preprint reports exact numerical checks, including the squared natural-square case d=nd=n for n7n \le 7 and an explicit check at n=4n=4. These computations support the formula but do not establish it for general nn and dd; no retrieved source gives a proof, counterexample, refutation, or independent verification.

Current status (as of August 2026): Numerical cases are settled in the reported examples, but the unified formula and the associated first-appearance-degree claim remain unproved and open in general.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kenichi Takemura, “Alternating Power Difference and Matrix Symmetry: Closed-Form Formulas for the First Appearance Degree m_1”, arXiv:2512.18169 (2025).

Solutions 1

Proof

For any n×nn\times n matrix AA, the determinant expansion gives

m0APDm(A)zmm!=det(ezAij)i,j=1n.(1)\sum_{m\ge0}\operatorname{APD}_m(A)\frac{z^m}{m!} =\det(e^{zA_{ij}})_{i,j=1}^n. \tag{1}

Set T=(n2)T=\binom n2. First consider the multiplication table Mij=ijM_{ij}=ij. With y=ezy=e^z, the Vandermonde determinant gives

det(ezij)i,j=1n=det(yij)i,j=1n=yn(n+1)/21i<jn(yjyi).\det(e^{zij})_{i,j=1}^n =\det(y^{ij})_{i,j=1}^n =y^{n(n+1)/2} \prod_{1\le i<j\le n}(y^j-y^i).

Each factor satisfies yjyi=(ji)z+O(z2)y^j-y^i=(j-i)z+O(z^2). Since there are TT factors and

1i<jn(ji)=k=1n1k!,\prod_{1\le i<j\le n}(j-i)=\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!,

equation (1) yields

m1(M)=T,APDT(M)=T!k=1n1k!.m_1(M)=T,\qquad \operatorname{APD}_T(M)=T!\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Now take the row-shifted second-power lattice

Aij=(j+(i1)d)2,d>0,A_{ij}=(j+(i-1)d)^2,\qquad d>0,

and put q=e2dzq=e^{2dz}. Since

Aij=j2+d2(i1)2+2d(i1)j,A_{ij}=j^2+d^2(i-1)^2+2d(i-1)j,

extracting row and column factors gives

det(ezAij)=exp(zj=1nj2+zd2i=0n1i2)qT0i<jn1(qjqi).\det(e^{zA_{ij}}) = \exp\left( z\sum_{j=1}^n j^2+ zd^2\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}i^2 \right) q^T \prod_{0\le i<j\le n-1}(q^j-q^i).

Because

qjqi=2d(ji)z+O(z2),q^j-q^i=2d(j-i)z+O(z^2),

this determinant has exact vanishing order TT and leading coefficient

(2d)Tk=1n1k!.(2d)^T\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Therefore

m1(A)=(n2),APD(n2)(A)=(2d)(n2)((n2))!k=1n1k!.m_1(A)=\binom n2, \qquad \operatorname{APD}_{\binom n2}(A) =(2d)^{\binom n2} \left(\binom n2\right)! \prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Equivalently, if

VCore(n)=T!k=1n1k!,V_{\mathrm{Core}}(n)=T!\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!,

then

APDT(A)=(2d)TVCore(n).\operatorname{APD}_T(A)=(2d)^TV_{\mathrm{Core}}(n).

These identities hold for every n2n\ge2 and every positive integer dd.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·