First appearance degree conjecture for row-shifted second-power lattices

About 1 year old · traced to

Let AA be the nn-th order row-shifted second-power lattice with positive integer shift dd, whose entries are A[i,j]=(j+(i−1)d)2A[i,j]=(j+(i-1)d)^2. Define

Tn−1=n(n−1)2.T_{n-1}=\frac{n(n-1)}{2}.

Row-shifted second-power lattice degree conjecture. For n≥2n \geq 2 and any positive integer dd,

m1(A)=Tn−1.m_1(A)=T_{n-1}.

The source describes this as numerically confirmed, but gives no proof for arbitrary nn and dd.

References

Primary source

Kenichi Takemura, “Alternating Power Difference and Matrix Symmetry: Closed-Form Formulas for the First Appearance Degree m_1”, arXiv:2512.18169 (2025).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A reader-submitted argument claims a general proof, but it has not been independently verified.

The conjecture predicts that the first nonzero degree equals n(n−1)2\frac{n(n-1)}{2} for every dimension n≥2n \geq 2 and every positive integer shift dd. The original paper presents this as numerically supported, not proved.

Known results

  • Exact rational computations verify the claimed degree through n=7n=7 in reported cases, including d=nd=n; arbitrary nn and dd remain unproved in the published record.

Community submission (unverified)

Posted August 20, 2026, a submitted argument uses the generating-function identity ∑m≥0APD⁡m(A)zmm!=det⁡(ezAij)\sum_{m\geq 0}\operatorname{APD}_m(A)\frac{z^m}{m!}=\det(e^{zA_{ij}}) and a Vandermonde factorization with q=e2dzq=e^{2dz}. It claims exact vanishing order n(n−1)2\frac{n(n-1)}{2} for all n≥2n \geq 2 and positive integer dd, along with the corresponding leading coefficient, but the argument has no independent verification.

Current status (as of September 2026): The conjecture is computationally confirmed through n=7n=7, while a community-submitted argument claims the full result for all n≥2n \geq 2 and positive integer dd but remains unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

For any n×nn\times n matrix AA, the determinant expansion gives

∑m≥0APD⁡m(A)zmm!=det⁡(ezAij)i,j=1n.(1)\sum_{m\ge0}\operatorname{APD}_m(A)\frac{z^m}{m!} =\det(e^{zA_{ij}})_{i,j=1}^n. \tag{1}

Set T=(n2)T=\binom n2. First consider the multiplication table Mij=ijM_{ij}=ij. With y=ezy=e^z, the Vandermonde determinant gives

det⁡(ezij)i,j=1n=det⁡(yij)i,j=1n=yn(n+1)/2∏1≤i<j≤n(yj−yi).\det(e^{zij})_{i,j=1}^n =\det(y^{ij})_{i,j=1}^n =y^{n(n+1)/2} \prod_{1\le i<j\le n}(y^j-y^i).

Each factor satisfies yj−yi=(j−i)z+O(z2)y^j-y^i=(j-i)z+O(z^2). Since there are TT factors and

∏1≤i<j≤n(j−i)=∏k=1n−1k!,\prod_{1\le i<j\le n}(j-i)=\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!,

equation (1) yields

m1(M)=T,APD⁡T(M)=T!∏k=1n−1k!.m_1(M)=T,\qquad \operatorname{APD}_T(M)=T!\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Now take the row-shifted second-power lattice

Aij=(j+(i−1)d)2,d>0,A_{ij}=(j+(i-1)d)^2,\qquad d>0,

and put q=e2dzq=e^{2dz}. Since

Aij=j2+d2(i−1)2+2d(i−1)j,A_{ij}=j^2+d^2(i-1)^2+2d(i-1)j,

extracting row and column factors gives

det⁡(ezAij)=exp⁡(z∑j=1nj2+zd2∑i=0n−1i2)qT∏0≤i<j≤n−1(qj−qi).\det(e^{zA_{ij}}) = \exp\left( z\sum_{j=1}^n j^2+ zd^2\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}i^2 \right) q^T \prod_{0\le i<j\le n-1}(q^j-q^i).

Because

qj−qi=2d(j−i)z+O(z2),q^j-q^i=2d(j-i)z+O(z^2),

this determinant has exact vanishing order TT and leading coefficient

(2d)T∏k=1n−1k!.(2d)^T\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Therefore

m1(A)=(n2),APD⁡(n2)(A)=(2d)(n2)((n2))!∏k=1n−1k!.m_1(A)=\binom n2, \qquad \operatorname{APD}_{\binom n2}(A) =(2d)^{\binom n2} \left(\binom n2\right)! \prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Equivalently, if

VCore(n)=T!∏k=1n−1k!,V_{\mathrm{Core}}(n)=T!\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!,

then

APD⁡T(A)=(2d)TVCore(n).\operatorname{APD}_T(A)=(2d)^TV_{\mathrm{Core}}(n).

These identities hold for every n≥2n\ge2 and every positive integer dd.