Pure transport limit for ascent and descent stability

About 1 year old · traced to

Let Ω\Omega be a domain, let β∈[L∞(Ω)]d\boldsymbol{\beta}\in [L^\infty(\Omega)]^d be divergence-free, and let LL be the transport operator with inflow boundary conditions,

Lu=β⋅∇u.L u=\boldsymbol{\beta}\cdot\nabla u.

For a discrete scheme, let ThT_h be the resulting operators, let G(A)G(A) denote the graph of an operator AA, let γh\gamma_h be the reduced minimum modulus associated with Th−λT_h-\lambda, and let asc⁡\operatorname{asc} and dsc⁡\operatorname{dsc} denote ascent and descent. Pure transport limit. If

G(Th−λ)→gapG(L−λ)G(T_h-\lambda)\xrightarrow{\mathrm{gap}}G(L-\lambda)

as h→0h\to0 and

lim inf⁡h→0γh>0,\liminf_{h\to0}\gamma_h>0,

then, for all sufficiently small hh,

asc⁡(Th−λ)=asc⁡(L−λ),dsc⁡(Th−λ)=dsc⁡(L−λ).\operatorname{asc}(T_h-\lambda)=\operatorname{asc}(L-\lambda),\qquad \operatorname{dsc}(T_h-\lambda)=\operatorname{dsc}(L-\lambda).

The claim concerns preservation of ascent and descent under graph-gap convergence when the reduced minimum modulus stays uniformly positive; the supplied text does not establish whether this statement is proved, conjectural, or open.

References

Primary source

Marwa Ennaceur, “Sharp Ascent–Descent Spectral Stability under Strong Resolvent Convergence”, arXiv:2511.20971 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.