The finite Dehn twist representation cohomology conjecture

From papers

Let SgnS_g^n be a compact oriented surface of genus gg with nn boundary components, and let Mod(Sgn)\mathrm{Mod}(S_g^n) denote its mapping class group. A representation is a finite Dehn twist representation if every Dehn twist has finite order under the representation; it is semisimple if the corresponding representation is semisimple. Finite Dehn twist representation conjecture. For any g3g\geq 3, n0n\geq 0, and semisimple finite Dehn twist representation ρ\rho of Mod(Sgn)\mathrm{Mod}(S_g^n),

H1(Mod(Sg,n),ρ)=0.H^1(\mathrm{Mod}(S_{g,n}),\rho)=0.

The conjecture is motivated by Litt's rigidity conjecture and by restrictions on representations of mapping class groups. In genus at least 33, finite Dehn twist representations are equivalent to representations sending Dehn twists to diagonalizable elements, and unitary representations provide important examples; the conjecture remains open in the supplied text.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Pierre Godfard, “Rigidity of SU(2) and SO(3) quantum representations of mapping class groups at prime levels”, arXiv:2511.19795 (2025).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.