Discretized classical sticky Kakeya conjecture in Rn\mathbb{R}^n

Fix a Hörmander-type phase function ϕ\phi. For parameters ε,η,δ0>0\varepsilon,\eta,\delta_0>0, let SK(ϕ,ε,η,δ0)\mathrm{SK}(\phi,\varepsilon,\eta,\delta_0) denote the assertion that for every δ(0,δ0)\delta\in(0,\delta_0) and every collection of shaded (δ,ϕ)(\delta,\phi)-tubes satisfying: the tubes are essentially distinct; for every δρ1\delta\leqslant\rho\leqslant1 the collection can be covered by (ρ,ϕ)(\rho,\phi)-tubes, at most δη\delta^{-\eta} of which are pairwise essentially parallel; and TTY(T)δη\sum_{T\in\mathbb{T}}|Y(T)|\geqslant\delta^\eta, one has

TTY(T)δε.\left|\bigcup_{T\in\mathbb{T}}Y(T)\right|\geqslant\delta^\varepsilon.

Discretized sticky Kakeya conjecture. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there exist η=ηn,rest(ε)>0\eta=\eta_{n,\mathrm{rest}}(\varepsilon)>0 and δ0=δ0,n,rest(ε)>0\delta_0=\delta_{0,n,\mathrm{rest}}(\varepsilon)>0 such that

SK(ϕn,rest,ε,η,δ0)\mathrm{SK}(\phi_{n,\mathrm{rest}},\varepsilon,\eta,\delta_0)

holds.

This is the discretized formulation of the classical sticky Kakeya conjecture in dimension nn, designed to connect sticky Kakeya geometry with restriction estimates. The source provides no evidence of a proof or refutation.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Arian Nadjimzadah, “Bourgain's condition, sticky Kakeya, and new examples”, arXiv:2511.10918 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.