Ill-posedness conjecture for the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation with an L1+L∞L^1+L^\infty potential

About 13 years old · traced to

Let d=2d=2 and consider the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (eq:NLS) with potential η∈Lx1+Lx∞(R2)\eta \in L_x^1+L_x^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^2). For γ∈R\gamma \in \mathbb{R}, well-posedness in Hxγ(R2)H_x^\gamma(\mathbb{R}^2) means existence of a solution theory with the usual uniqueness and continuous-dependence properties, while ill-posedness means that this well-posedness fails.

Ill-posedness conjecture. For any γ∈R\gamma\in \mathbb{R}, there exists η∈Lx1+Lx∞(R2)\eta \in L_x^1+L_x^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^2) such that (eq:NLS) is ill-posed in Hxγ(R2)H_x^\gamma(\mathbb{R}^2).

The preceding results establish sharp well-posedness in all other parameter regimes considered in the paper, leaving only the case d=2d=2 and r=1r=1. The conjecture asserts that no Sobolev regularity yields well-posedness for at least one potential in this endpoint class.

References

Primary source

Ruobing Bai, Yajie Lian and Yifei Wu, “Regularization for the Schrödinger equation with rough potential: high-dimensional case”, arXiv:2510.25555 (2025).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2013–2025). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1307.7090.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.