Equality of the three-dimensional abelian Cremona group classes

About 1 year old · traced to

Let A3\mathcal{A}_3 and B3\mathcal{B}_3 be the classes of finite abelian groups arising in the paper, and let

A3′=PA3=A1×A2,\mathcal{A}'_3=\mathcal{PA}_3=\mathcal{A}_1\times\mathcal{A}_2,

while

B3′=A3+{G1,G2,G3,G4},\mathcal{B}'_3=\mathcal{A}_3+\{G_1,G_2,G_3,G_4\},

where G1=(Z/4)4G_1=(\mathbb{Z}/4)^4, G2=(Z/8)2×(Z/4)×Z/2G_2=(\mathbb{Z}/8)^2\times(\mathbb{Z}/4)\times\mathbb{Z}/2, G3=(Z/6)2×(Z/3)2G_3=(\mathbb{Z}/6)^2\times(\mathbb{Z}/3)^2, and G4=(Z/6)3×Z/2G_4=(\mathbb{Z}/6)^3\times\mathbb{Z}/2. The inclusions A3′⊆A3\mathcal{A}'_3\subseteq\mathcal{A}_3 and B3′⊆B3\mathcal{B}'_3\subseteq\mathcal{B}_3 hold. Three-dimensional class conjecture. One has

A3=A3′,B3=B3′.\mathcal{A}_3=\mathcal{A}'_3,\qquad \mathcal{B}_3=\mathcal{B}'_3.

The conjecture would classify the relevant finite abelian groups in dimension three by showing that no groups beyond the explicitly listed candidates occur. The supplied context does not state whether these equalities have been proved or disproved.

References

Primary source

Luka Filin, “On abelian extensions of finite abelian subgroups of Cremona groups”, arXiv:2510.13200 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.