Gamow's conjecture for the Coulomb liquid drop model

About 1 year old · traced to

Let mball⁡m_{\operatorname{ball}} be the critical mass below which balls minimize the liquid drop energy, let mexm_\mathrm{ex} be the critical mass up to which minimizers exist, and let mcritm_\mathrm{crit} be the mass at which the energy of one ball equals twice that of a ball of half the mass. Gamow's conjecture. If n=3n=3 and α=1\alpha=1, then

mball⁡=mex=mcrit.m_{\operatorname{ball}}=m_\mathrm{ex}=m_\mathrm{crit}.

Equivalently, the ball of mass mm is the unique minimizer up to translations for mleqmcritmleq m_{\mathrm{crit}}, and no minimizer exists for m>mcritm>m_{\mathrm{crit}}. This conjecture is supported by known results on the liquid drop model and remains open in the Coulomb case; the paper notes that analogous equality is expected in arbitrary dimension and for every 0<α<n0<\alpha<n.

References

Primary source

Lia Bronsard, Benoît Merlet and Marc Pegon, “Non-spherical minimizers in the generalized liquid drop model for Yukawa and truncated Coulomb potentials”, arXiv:2510.11893 (2025).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Open

The conjecture remains open: existing work proves only small-mass and large-mass regimes, not the exact transition claimed.

The conjecture asserts that in three dimensions with Coulomb interaction, the ball is the unique minimizer up to the critical mass and that minimizers do not exist above it, equivalently mball⁡=mex=mcritm_{\operatorname{ball}}=m_{\mathrm{ex}}=m_{\mathrm{crit}}. No source identifies an originator or date for the conjecture.

Known results

  • For sufficiently small masses, balls are unique minimizers in the relevant dimensional and exponent ranges, including n=3n=3, α=1\alpha=1.
  • For 0<α<20<\alpha<2, minimizers do not exist for sufficiently large masses.
  • In three dimensions, the explicit ball-splitting threshold is m∗=521/3−11−2−2/3≈3.512m_*=5\frac{2^{1/3}-1}{1-2^{-2/3}}\approx3.512, but its equality with the existence and ball-minimality thresholds is unproved.

2025 screened-interaction results

A 2025 paper states the Coulomb conjecture explicitly but does not resolve it: its counterexamples concern truncated Coulomb and Yukawa kernels, while the unscreened Coulomb case remains untreated.

Current status (as of September 2026): the conjecture remains open; small-mass ball minimality, large-mass nonexistence, and the explicit threshold are known, but mball⁡=mex=mcritm_{\operatorname{ball}}=m_{\mathrm{ex}}=m_{\mathrm{crit}} is not proved or disproved.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.