Fixed-point conjecture for the EFX allocation map
Fixed-point conjecture for the EFX allocation map
Let agents and goods be given, with valuation parameters and . Let be arbitrarily small and assume . Let
be the continuous map whose coordinates are
T_{kj}(y)=\min\left\\{y_{kj},h(y_k)-A_{kj}(y)\right\\},for all , where and are defined as in the source. Fixed-point conjecture. The map admits a fixed point. This fixed-point claim is intended to characterize the existence of an EFX allocation through the preceding reduction: a fixed point of the map corresponds to an EFX allocation. The statement is presented as a conjecture, and no resolution is supplied in the given text.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
S. Rasoul Etesami, “A Fixed Point Framework for the Existence of EFX Allocations”, arXiv:2510.04915 (2025).
Progress summary
The conjecture remains unresolved: numerical tests support it, but no proof or counterexample has been found.
The conjecture asks whether the continuous map admits a fixed point, which the preceding reduction makes equivalent to the existence of an EFX allocation. The relevant manuscript labels this as Conjecture 5 and reports that its authors do not know the answer.
Known results
- Brouwer’s theorem guarantees a fixed point for a perturbed proxy map , but the required implication for the original EFX constraints is unproved.
- Numerical experiments consistently found fixed points of both the original and proxy maps, without yielding a theorem.
2025 manuscript
The manuscript explains that direct application of Brouwer fails because maps into rather than necessarily into its own domain. The supplied scan found no proof, counterexample, or independent verification for this conjecture.
Current status (as of August 2026): the fixed-point conjecture and hence the general EFX existence question remain open; only the proxy-map fixed-point result and supporting numerical evidence are established.
Sources
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.