The Hilbert-Chow and symmetric-power diagram for Kleinian quiver varieties

About 1 year old · traced to

Let 0∈J⊆I0 \in J \subseteq I and set K≔I∖JK \coloneqq I \setminus J. Let XJX_J be the corresponding partial resolution of the Kleinian singularity, let g:XJ→X0g:X_J\to X_0 be the natural morphism, and let σK\sigma_K be the associated stability cone. The Hilbert-Chow and symmetric-power conjecture. If θ\theta lies in the relative interior of σK\sigma_K and θ′\theta' lies in the relative interior of σK∩δ⊥\sigma_K \cap \delta^{\perp}, then there is a commutative diagram

\begin{tikzcd} \operatorname{Hilb}^n(X_J) \arrow[r, "\sim"] \arrow[d] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_{\theta}(n \delta,w) \arrow[d] \\\\ \operatorname{Sym}^n(X_J) \arrow[r, "\sim"] \arrow[d] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_{\theta'}(n \delta,w) \arrow[d] \\\\ \operatorname{Sym}^n(X_0) \arrow[r, "\sim"] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_0(n \delta,w), \end{tikzcd}

in which all morphisms are birational and projective, the horizontal morphisms are isomorphisms, the upper and middle horizontal morphisms are induced by g∗g_*, the upper left vertical morphism is the Hilbert-Chow morphism, the lower left vertical morphism is Sym⁡n(g)\operatorname{Sym}^n(g), and the right vertical morphisms arise from GIT specialisation. The conjecture identifies the remaining intermediate partial resolutions in the diagram of Nakajima quiver varieties.

References

Primary source

Lukas Bertsch and Ruth Wye, “Stacky Resolutions of Kleinian Singularities and Nakajima Quiver Varieties”, arXiv:2509.22569 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.