The Hilbert-Chow and symmetric-power diagram for Kleinian quiver varieties

Let 0JI0 \in J \subseteq I and set KIJK \coloneqq I \setminus J. Let XJX_J be the corresponding partial resolution of the Kleinian singularity, let g:XJX0g:X_J\to X_0 be the natural morphism, and let σK\sigma_K be the associated stability cone. The Hilbert-Chow and symmetric-power conjecture. If θ\theta lies in the relative interior of σK\sigma_K and θ\theta' lies in the relative interior of σKδ\sigma_K \cap \delta^{\perp}, then there is a commutative diagram

\begin{tikzcd} \operatorname{Hilb}^n(X_J) \arrow[r, "\sim"] \arrow[d] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_{\theta}(n \delta,w) \arrow[d] \\\\ \operatorname{Sym}^n(X_J) \arrow[r, "\sim"] \arrow[d] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_{\theta'}(n \delta,w) \arrow[d] \\\\ \operatorname{Sym}^n(X_0) \arrow[r, "\sim"] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_0(n \delta,w), \end{tikzcd}

in which all morphisms are birational and projective, the horizontal morphisms are isomorphisms, the upper and middle horizontal morphisms are induced by gg_*, the upper left vertical morphism is the Hilbert-Chow morphism, the lower left vertical morphism is Symn(g)\operatorname{Sym}^n(g), and the right vertical morphisms arise from GIT specialisation. The conjecture identifies the remaining intermediate partial resolutions in the diagram of Nakajima quiver varieties.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Lukas Bertsch and Ruth Wye, “Stacky Resolutions of Kleinian Singularities and Nakajima Quiver Varieties”, arXiv:2509.22569 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.