The Hilbert-Chow and symmetric-power diagram for Kleinian quiver varieties
The Hilbert-Chow and symmetric-power diagram for Kleinian quiver varieties
Let and set . Let be the corresponding partial resolution of the Kleinian singularity, let be the natural morphism, and let be the associated stability cone. The Hilbert-Chow and symmetric-power conjecture. If lies in the relative interior of and lies in the relative interior of , then there is a commutative diagram
\begin{tikzcd} \operatorname{Hilb}^n(X_J) \arrow[r, "\sim"] \arrow[d] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_{\theta}(n \delta,w) \arrow[d] \\\\ \operatorname{Sym}^n(X_J) \arrow[r, "\sim"] \arrow[d] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_{\theta'}(n \delta,w) \arrow[d] \\\\ \operatorname{Sym}^n(X_0) \arrow[r, "\sim"] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_0(n \delta,w), \end{tikzcd}in which all morphisms are birational and projective, the horizontal morphisms are isomorphisms, the upper and middle horizontal morphisms are induced by , the upper left vertical morphism is the Hilbert-Chow morphism, the lower left vertical morphism is , and the right vertical morphisms arise from GIT specialisation. The conjecture identifies the remaining intermediate partial resolutions in the diagram of Nakajima quiver varieties.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Lukas Bertsch and Ruth Wye, “Stacky Resolutions of Kleinian Singularities and Nakajima Quiver Varieties”, arXiv:2509.22569 (2026).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.