The Hilbert-Chow and symmetric-power diagram for Kleinian quiver varieties
Let and set . Let be the corresponding partial resolution of the Kleinian singularity, let be the natural morphism, and let be the associated stability cone. The Hilbert-Chow and symmetric-power conjecture. If lies in the relative interior of and lies in the relative interior of , then there is a commutative diagram
\begin{tikzcd} \operatorname{Hilb}^n(X_J) \arrow[r, "\sim"] \arrow[d] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_{\theta}(n \delta,w) \arrow[d] \\\\ \operatorname{Sym}^n(X_J) \arrow[r, "\sim"] \arrow[d] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_{\theta'}(n \delta,w) \arrow[d] \\\\ \operatorname{Sym}^n(X_0) \arrow[r, "\sim"] & \operatorname{\mathfrak{M}}_0(n \delta,w), \end{tikzcd}in which all morphisms are birational and projective, the horizontal morphisms are isomorphisms, the upper and middle horizontal morphisms are induced by , the upper left vertical morphism is the Hilbert-Chow morphism, the lower left vertical morphism is , and the right vertical morphisms arise from GIT specialisation. The conjecture identifies the remaining intermediate partial resolutions in the diagram of Nakajima quiver varieties.
References
Primary source
Lukas Bertsch and Ruth Wye, “Stacky Resolutions of Kleinian Singularities and Nakajima Quiver Varieties”, arXiv:2509.22569 (2026).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.