Equivariant Iwasawa main conjecture for Tate motives

Let k/kk_\infty/k be a \mathdsZp\mathds Z_p-power extension with no finite place splitting completely, let K=KkK_\infty=Kk_\infty, and use the source's decomposition and character χ\chi to define Tχ=O(1)(χ)T_\chi=\mathcal O(1)(\chi) and Tχ=ΛF(1)(χ)\mathcal T_\chi=\Lambda_F(1)(\chi). Let ΘK/k,S(K),b\Theta_{K_\infty/k,S(K),b_\bullet} be the projection map and let εK,Σχ\varepsilon^\chi_{K_\infty,\Sigma} be the induced Rubin--Stark Euler-system element. Equivariant Iwasawa main conjecture. There is a ΛF\Lambda_F-basis zF,S(K),Σχ\mathfrak z^\chi_{F_\infty,S(K),\Sigma} of DetΛF(CS(K),Σ(Tχ))\operatorname{Det}_{\Lambda_F}(C_{S(K),\Sigma}(\mathcal T_\chi)) such that

εK,Σχ=ΘK/k,S(K),b(zK,S(K),Σχ).\varepsilon^\chi_{K_\infty,\Sigma}=\Theta_{K_\infty/k,S(K),b_\bullet}(\mathfrak z^\chi_{K_\infty,S(K),\Sigma}).

This asserts that the Rubin--Stark Euler-system element generates the determinant line under the projection map, giving an equivariant higher-rank Iwasawa main conjecture; no resolution is supplied in the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Dominik Bullach and David Burns, “On Euler systems and Nekovář-Selmer complexes”, arXiv:2509.13894 (2026).

Additional references

8 papers in this index state this conjecture (2011–2025). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2102.01545, arXiv:2010.03186, arXiv:1904.03010, arXiv:1703.06803, arXiv:1509.00200, arXiv:1408.4934, arXiv:1109.5525.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.