Logarithmic Kazhdan–Lusztig conjecture for screening subalgebras and Nichols algebras

From papers

Let α1,,αnRn\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n\in\mathbb{R}^n satisfy the convergence condition in the preceding theorem. Let H\mathcal{H} be the ambient algebra and let WHn\mathcal{W}\subset\mathcal{H}^{\otimes n} be the subalgebra defined by

W=i=1nker(Zαi),\mathcal{W}=\bigcap_{i=1}^n\ker(\mathfrak{Z}_{\alpha_i}),

where Zαi\mathfrak{Z}_{\alpha_i} are the screening operators. Set

C=VectRn1,σ,X=Cα1Cαn,σ(αi,αj)=eπi(αi,αj).\mathcal{C}={\rm Vect}_{\mathbb{R}^n}^{1,\sigma},\qquad X=\mathbb{C}_{\alpha_1}\oplus\cdots\oplus\mathbb{C}_{\alpha_n},\qquad \sigma(\alpha_i,\alpha_j)=e^{\pi\mathrm{i}(\alpha_i,\alpha_j)}.

Logarithmic Kazhdan–Lusztig conjecture. In good cases, there is an equivalence of braided tensor categories

Rep(W)ZC(Rep(B(X))(C)).{\rm Rep}(\mathcal{W})\cong \mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{C}}\bigl({\rm Rep}(\mathfrak{B}(X))(\mathcal{C})\bigr).

The right-hand side is the generalized quantum group associated to the Nichols algebra of screenings. The conjecture proposes a categorical correspondence between screening-defined vertex-algebraic objects and Nichols-algebraic quantum groups; the source notes that suitable finiteness conditions are required and that non-rigid examples can obstruct faithfulness. In the example involving the Feigin–Tipunin algebra, it specializes to an equivalence with representations of the quasi-quantum group u~q(g)\tilde{u}_q(\mathfrak{g}).

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Simon D. Lentner, “Nichols algebras, tensor categories and Kazhdan-Lusztig correspondences”, arXiv:2509.12909 (2025).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.