The symmetric-function identity for the fall version

About 1 year old · traced to

For n,k∈Nn,k\in\mathbb{N}, let Θek\Theta_{e_k}, ∇\nabla, and ω\omega be the indicated symmetric-function operators, let pnp_n and pn,n(k+1)p_{n,n(k+1)} be the relevant symmetric functions, and let s(n−1)k⊥s_{(n-1)^k}^{\perp} denote the skewing operator. Fall-version symmetric-function identity.

Θek∇ω(pn)=s(n−1)k⊥pn,n(k+1).\Theta_{e_k}\nabla\omega(p_n)=s_{(n-1)^k}^{\perp}p_{n,n(k+1)}.

The source states this identity after asserting that the right-hand side of the fall conjecture already has a formula, but supplies no proof or resolution; it remains open here.

References

Primary source

Alessandro Iraci, Roberto Pagaria and Giovanni Paolini, “Falling stars: a fall-decorated rational shuffle theorem”, arXiv:2508.20935 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.