The rigid-component conjecture for parabolic induction

Let d\mathbf{d} be a dimension vector, let Comp(d)\mathbf{Comp}(\mathbf{d}) denote the set of irreducible components under consideration, and let GdG_{\mathbf{d}} act on the corresponding representation variety. The Deligne–Langlands correspondence gives a bijection Cπ(C)C\mapsto\pi(C) between Comp(d)\mathbf{Comp}(\mathbf{d}) and the relevant irreducible representations.

Rigid-component conjecture. For CComp(d)C\in\mathbf{Comp}(\mathbf{d}), the induced representation π(C)×π(C)\pi(C)\times\pi(C) is irreducible if and only if CC contains an open GdG_{\mathbf{d}}-orbit.

Irreducible components satisfying this condition are called rigid. The conjecture relates irreducibility of parabolic induction to the geometry of Lusztig's characteristic variety and is attributed in the source to Geiss–Schröer and Lapid–Mínguez.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Johannes Droschl, “Poles of intertwining operators in terms of irreducible components of Lusztig's characteristic variety in type A”, arXiv:2508.13817 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.