Nontriviality conjecture for the classes X4k+2X_{4k+2}

From papers

For every k=1,2,k=1,2,\dots, let

X4k+2=π([L^4k+1,σ4k+1])4k+2,X_{4k+2}=\pi\bigl([\hat L_{4k+1},\sigma_{4k+1}]\bigr)_{4k+2},

where X4k+2X_{4k+2} is the trivalent leading term described in the source, and let GC24k+2-loop\mathsf{GC}_2^{4k+2\text{-loop}} denote the corresponding loop-order component of the graph complex.

Nontriviality conjecture. For every k=1,2,k=1,2,\dots, the element X4k+2X_{4k+2} defines a non-trivial cohomology class in

H4k1(GC24k+2-loop).H^{4k-1}\bigl(\mathsf{GC}_2^{4k+2\text{-loop}}\bigr).

The conjecture has been checked for k=1k=1 and k=2k=2. In particular, the class X10X_{10} generates H7(GC210-loop)H^7(\mathsf{GC}_2^{10\text{-loop}}) in the checked case and survives to the stated spectral-sequence page; the general assertion remains open.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Thomas Willwacher, “The 11-loop graph cohomology”, arXiv:2508.13724 (2025).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.