Beilinson extension conjecture for geometric height pairings

Let XX be the generic fibre of a regular projective model π:XB\pi:\mathcal{X}\rightarrow B, with a1CHhomp(X)Qa_{1}\in CH^{p}_{\operatorname{hom}}(X)_{\mathbb{Q}} and a2CHhomq(X)Qa_{2}\in CH^{q}_{\operatorname{hom}}(X)_{\mathbb{Q}}, where p+q=d+1p+q=d+1. An extension of aia_i is a cycle a~iCHi(X)Q\widetilde{a}_i\in CH^i(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbb{Q}} restricting to aia_i on XX.

Beilinson extension conjecture. For each a1CHhomp(X)Qa_{1}\in CH^{p}_{\operatorname{hom}}(X)_{\mathbb{Q}}, there exists a Beilinson extension a~1CHp(X)Q\widetilde{a}_{1}\in CH^{p}(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbb{Q}} such that for every extension a~2CHq(X)Q\widetilde{a}_{2}\in CH^{q}(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbb{Q}} of 0CHq(X)0\in CH^{q}(X),

π(a~1a~2)=0.\pi_{*}(\widetilde{a}_{1}\cap\widetilde{a}_{2})=0.

Such an extension would make the geometric height pairing independent of the choice of extension of the second cycle, even when the model is not smooth. The preceding lemma establishes the analogous vanishing for a smooth model; the conjecture asserts that a suitable extension exists in general.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Thomas Wisson, “Properties of the Beilinson Height Pairing”, arXiv:2508.08041 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.