The hiding conjecture for Gaussian boson sampling
Let be the top-left submatrix of an Haar-random unitary matrix. Let be a random matrix distributed according to either , the ensemble of symmetric matrices with independent entries modulo symmetry, diagonal entries distributed as , and off-diagonal entries as , or , the ensemble of matrices for an matrix with independent entries. Here denotes total variation distance. Hiding conjecture for Gaussian boson sampling. For and either distribution of , there exist polynomials and such that, for every and ,
This asserts that the relevant submatrix of a Haar unitary product can be hidden in total variation distance as a complex-Gaussian matrix, which is needed to transfer average-case hafnian hardness to approximate Gaussian boson sampling. The paper presents this formulation as adapted from an earlier conjecture and proves it for the maximal-squeezing regime, while the general statement remains the conjectural framework.
References
Primary source
Laura Shou, Sarah H. Miller and Victor Galitski, “Proof of Hiding Conjecture in Gaussian Boson Sampling”, arXiv:2508.00983 (2025).
Progress summary
A new August 2026 preprint claims to prove the conjecture for any number of squeezed inputs, but the claim has not been independently verified.
The conjecture asserts that a matrix formed from a Haar-random optical transformation is statistically close to a Gaussian comparison matrix for . This approximation is a key ingredient in transferring average-case hardness to Gaussian boson sampling.
Known results
- Maximal squeezing, : the Gaussian approximation was proved for , with error .
- Sparse-squeezer regimes, including , were established in earlier work, but these cases did not cover the full conjecture.
- A related comparison with was known only in restricted parameter ranges.
August 21, 2026 arbitrary-input proof claim
Laura Shou, Alexey V. Gorshkov, Victor Galitski, and Sarah H. Miller claim a proof for arbitrary squeezed-input number. Their preprint states and combines this with earlier sparse-regime results to claim the full range; it also replaces a failing density-based hardness-reduction step with approximate instance generation. This remains an unverified preprint claim.
Current status (as of August 2026): The maximal-squeezing and previously known sparse regimes are established, while the claimed full arbitrary-input result remains unverified.
Sources
- arxiv.org
- inspirehep.net
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- the-walrus.readthedocs.io
- www-cdn.anthropic.com
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- quantamagazine.org
- deepmind.google
- deepmind.google
- x.com
- x.com
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.