Fayers' divisibility conjecture for (s,s+t,s+2t,… )(s,s+t,s+2t,\dots)-core polynomials

About 1 year old · traced to

Let ss and tt be positive integers with gcd⁡(s,t)=1\gcd(s,t)=1, and let ft(s)f_t(s) be the polynomial appearing in Fayers' formula for the number of (s,s+t,s+2t,… )(s,s+t,s+2t,\dots)-core partitions. Fayers' divisibility conjecture. Suppose t≥2t \geq 2. Then ft(s)f_t(s) is divisible by s+t+(−1)ts+t+(-1)^t.

This is the second part of Fayers' conjecture and remains open according to the source.

References

Primary source

William Keith, Rishi Nath and James Sellers, “On simultaneous (s, s+t, s+2t, )-core partitions”, arXiv:2508.00074 (2025).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A 2025 paper established the polynomial formula, while a reader has posted a complete proof of the divisibility claim that has not been independently checked.

Fayers conjectured that, for coprime positive integers s,ts,t with t≥2t\geq2, the polynomial ft(s)f_t(s) counting these core partitions is divisible by s+t+(−1)ts+t+(-1)^t. Keith, Nath, and Sellers established the polynomial part of the conjecture in 2025, but their paper explicitly records the divisibility statement as open.

Known results

  • Keith, Nath, and Sellers (2025): the count equals 2s−tft(s)/t!2^{s-t}f_t(s)/t! when gcd⁡(s,t)=1\gcd(s,t)=1.
  • They proved that ft(s)f_t(s) is monic of degree t−1t-1 with nonnegative integer coefficients.
  • They gave the explicit Lah-number formula ft(s)=∑m=1tL(t,m)(s+1)m−1‾f_t(s)=\sum_{m=1}^{t}L(t,m)(s+1)^{\overline{m-1}}, where L(t,m)=t!m!(t−1m−1)L(t,m)=\frac{t!}{m!}\binom{t-1}{m-1}.
  • The same paper states that s+t+(−1)t∣ft(s)s+t+(-1)^t\mid f_t(s) remains open.

Posted attempt

A reader claims a complete proof by extracting a coefficient from the generating function and evaluating it at s=−t−(−1)ts=-t-(-1)^t, with a further claim about real roots and interlacing. This proof has not been independently verified and is not supported by the primary paper.

Current status (as of August 2026): The polynomial formula and first part are established; the divisibility conjecture has a posted complete-proof claim, but no independent verification, so it remains unresolved.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

Complete proof, with prior generating-function credit. Keith, Nath, and Sellers, Discrete Mathematics 349 (2026), 114958, Theorem 1.8 and Conjecture 1.14, prove the explicit Lah-polynomial formula

ft(s)=∑m=1tt!m!(t−1m−1)(s+1)m−1‾∈Z[s].f_t(s)=\sum_{m=1}^{t}\frac{t!}{m!}\binom{t-1}{m-1}(s+1)^{\overline{m-1}}\in\mathbb Z[s].

The associated generating function was already recorded by Vladeta Jovovic in 2003 in OEIS A079638. The new step below is its parity-dependent negative-diagonal extraction, which proves the previously open divisibility.

Reordering the coefficientwise finite sums, with y=z/(1−z)y=z/(1-z), gives

∑t≥1ft(s)t!zt=∑m≥1(s+1)m−1‾m!(z1−z)m=1s[(1−z1−2z)s−1].\begin{aligned} \sum_{t\ge1}\frac{f_t(s)}{t!}z^t &=\sum_{m\ge1}\frac{(s+1)^{\overline{m-1}}}{m!} \left(\frac z{1-z}\right)^m\\ &=\frac1s\left[\left(\frac{1-z}{1-2z}\right)^s-1\right]. \end{aligned}

The apparent division by ss is removable coefficientwise; the identity follows formally by differentiating in yy.

Fix t≥2t\ge2, and put

s0=−t−(−1)t,M=−s0=t+(−1)t>0.s_0=-t-(-1)^t,\qquad M=-s_0=t+(-1)^t>0.

Since s0≠0s_0\ne0, it suffices to show

[zt](1−2z1−z)M=0.[z^t]\left(\frac{1-2z}{1-z}\right)^M=0.

Make the invertible formal change w=z/(1−z)w=z/(1-z), so that z=w/(1+w)z=w/(1+w) and dz=dw/(1+w)2dz=dw/(1+w)^2. Formal residue substitution yields

[zt](1−2z1−z)M=[wt](1+w)t−1(1−w)M.[z^t]\left(\frac{1-2z}{1-z}\right)^M =[w^t](1+w)^{t-1}(1-w)^M.

If tt is odd, then M=t−1M=t-1, and the displayed coefficient is

[wt](1−w2)t−1=0.[w^t](1-w^2)^{t-1}=0.

If t=2ht=2h is even, then M=t+1M=t+1, and the coefficient is

[w2h](1−w2)2h−1(1−w)2=(−1)h(2h−1h)+(−1)h−1(2h−1h−1)=0.\begin{aligned} [w^{2h}](1-w^2)^{2h-1}(1-w)^2 &=(-1)^h\binom{2h-1}{h} +(-1)^{h-1}\binom{2h-1}{h-1}\\ &=0. \end{aligned}

Consequently ft(−t−(−1)t)=0f_t(-t-(-1)^t)=0 for every t≥2t\ge2, and monic polynomial division in Z[s]\mathbb Z[s] gives

s+t+(−1)t∣ft(s)in Z[s],t≥2.\boxed{\quad s+t+(-1)^t\mid f_t(s)\quad\text{in }\mathbb Z[s],\qquad t\ge2.\quad}

A further strengthening follows from the recurrence already proved in the same source,

ft(s)=(s+3(t−1))ft−1(s)−2(t−1)(t−2)ft−2(s).f_t(s)=(s+3(t-1))f_{t-1}(s)-2(t-1)(t-2)f_{t-2}(s).

Indeed, ft(s)=det⁡(sIt−1−Jt−1)f_t(s)=\det(sI_{t-1}-J_{t-1}), where the real symmetric tridiagonal matrix JJ has diagonal entries −3j-3j and consecutive off-diagonal entries 2j(j+1)\sqrt{2j(j+1)}. Its nonzero off-diagonal entries imply simple real eigenvalues, while the Lah formula gives strictly positive polynomial coefficients. Thus every root of ftf_t is simple and strictly negative, the prescribed root is simple, consecutive polynomials strictly interlace, and the quotient ft(s)/(s+t+(−1)t)f_t(s)/(s+t+(-1)^t) has strictly positive integer coefficients.