The Grothendieck-semigroup criterion for semiperfectness of localized group algebras

Let GG be a finite group, let pp be a prime, and let bbZ(p)GbbZ_{(p)}G be the group algebra over the localization of the integers at pp. For a ring RR, let bbG(R)bbG(R) and bbK(R)bbK(R) denote the Grothendieck rings over bbZbbZ of finitely generated RR-modules and finitely generated projective RR-modules, respectively, and let bbG+(R)bbG^+(R) and bbK+(R)bbK^+(R) be their positive Grothendieck semigroups. Consider the decomposition map and Cartan homomorphism

G(QG)αG(FpG)βK(FpG).\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{Q} G)\xrightarrow{\alpha}\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{F}_p G)\xleftarrow{\beta}\mathbf{K}(\mathbb{F}_p G).

Semiperfectness criterion. The ring Z(p)G\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}G is semiperfect if and only if

α(G+(QG))β(K+(FpG)).\alpha\bigl(\mathbf{G}^+(\mathbb{Q} G)\bigr)\supseteq\beta\bigl(\mathbf{K}^+(\mathbb{F}_p G)\bigr).

This conjecture is proposed as a workable criterion for semiperfectness in the modular case pGp\mid |G|, where the lifting of idempotents over the non-complete local ring Z(p)\mathbb{Z}_{(p)} is harder to characterize. In the ordinary case pGp\nmid |G|, the paper gives a complete criterion in terms of Schur indices and inertness of pp in character-value fields.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Dylan Johnston and Dmitriy Rumynin, “On a question by Roggenkamp about group algebras”, arXiv:2507.21316 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.