The Breuil–Kisin torsion monotonicity conjecture

Let X/OKX/\mathcal{O}_K be the fixed scheme, let S\mathfrak{S} be the Breuil–Kisin ring, and let EE be its Eisenstein polynomial. For the Breuil–Kisin cohomology module

Mi=HSi(X/OK),\mathfrak{M}^{i}=\mathrm{H}^i_{\mathfrak{S}}(X/\mathcal{O}_K),

write Mi,(n)\mathfrak{M}^{i,(n)} for the nn-fold Frobenius pullback. Let f(n)f(n) denote either

OK(Mi[u](n+1)[E])\ell_{\mathcal{O}_K}\left(\mathfrak{M}^{i}[u^\infty]^{(n+1)}[E]\right)

or

OK(Mi(n+1)[E]),\ell_{\mathcal{O}_K}\left(\overline{\mathfrak{M}^{i}}^{(n+1)}[E]\right),

where Mi[u]\mathfrak{M}^{i}[u^\infty] is its uu^\infty-torsion submodule and Mi\overline{\mathfrak{M}^{i}} is the indicated torsion quotient. Breuil–Kisin torsion conjecture. The function ff satisfies

f(a)ef(0),f(n)f(n+1)for all n.f(a)\leqslant e\cdot f(0),\qquad f(n)\leqslant f(n+1)\quad\text{for all }n.

This is a refinement of the main crystalline–de Rham torsion inequality, translating it into statements about structured torsion in Breuil–Kisin cohomology. The paper presents it as a conjectural framework; the general inequalities and monotonicity remain open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Abhinandan and Alex Youcis, “An integral comparison of crystalline and de Rham cohomology”, arXiv:2507.17631 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.