Exceptional negative coefficients conjecture for D′(2,3,n)D'(2,3,n)

About 1 year old · traced to

Let D′(k,m,n)D'(k,m,n) be defined by

∑n≥0D′(k,m,n)qn=q−m∑n≥0C′(k,m,n)qn−(q2,q2k;q2)∞(q;q2)∞2,\sum_{n\geq 0}D'(k,m,n)q^n=q^{-m}\sum_{n\geq 0}C'(k,m,n)q^n-\frac{(q^2,q^{2k};q^2)_\infty}{(q;q^2)_\infty^2},

where kk and mm are positive integers. A coefficient is negative when it is less than zero. The exceptional negative coefficients conjecture for D′(2,3,n)D'(2,3,n). The only negative coefficients of

∑n≥0D′(2,3,n)qn\sum_{n\geq 0}D'(2,3,n)q^n

occur at n=10n=10 and n=22n=22. The claim refines the expected sign pattern for a series for which full positivity is not asserted.

References

Primary source

George E. Andrews and Mohamed El Bachraoui, “Certain positive q-series and inequalities for two-color partitions”, arXiv:2507.09276 (2025).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

The conjecture remains publicly unproved, although a reader-submitted argument claims to identify the two exceptional negative coefficients.

George E. Andrews and Mohamed El Bachraoui proposed that the series has negative coefficients only at n=10n=10 and n=22n=22. Their preprint appeared in 2025, with a journal version in 2026.

Known results

  • Andrews and El Bachraoui prove positivity for the related C′(2,3,n)C'(2,3,n) series, but explicitly do not prove the corresponding assertion for D′(2,3,n)D'(2,3,n).

Community submission (unverified)

A submitted proof argues that D′(2,3,n)<0D'(2,3,n)<0 exactly when n∈{10,22}n\in\{10,22\}, with D′(2,3,10)=D′(2,3,22)=−1D'(2,3,10)=D'(2,3,22)=-1. It develops generating-function identities, divisor-count formulas, and a bound intended to establish the remaining nonnegativity; no independent verification was found.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture remains open in the published literature; a submitted proof claims a complete resolution, but that argument is unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

Exact classification of the negative coefficients of D′(2,3,n)D'(2,3,n)

George E. Andrews and Mohamed El Bachraoui formulate this assertion as Conjecture 3.6 of Certain positive qq-series and inequalities for two-color partitions, Arabian Journal of Mathematics 15 (2026), 551–560, and as Conjecture 4 in the original preprint.

We prove

D′(2,3,n)<0⟺n∈{10,22},D′(2,3,10)=D′(2,3,22)=−1.(1)D'(2,3,n)<0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad n\in\{10,22\}, \qquad D'(2,3,10)=D'(2,3,22)=-1. \tag{1}

1. Exact source identities

Put

F(q)=q−3∑n≥0C′(2,3,n)qn,H(q)=(q2,q4;q2)∞(q;q2)∞2.(2)F(q)=q^{-3}\sum_{n\geq0}C'(2,3,n)q^n, \qquad H(q)=\frac{(q^2,q^4;q^2)_\infty}{(q;q^2)_\infty^2}. \tag{2}

The published Theorem 3.2 gives

∑n≥0D′(2,3,n)qn=F(q)−H(q).(3)\sum_{n\geq0}D'(2,3,n)q^n=F(q)-H(q). \tag{3}

Specializing the published Theorem 2.2 to (k,m)=(2,3)(k,m)=(2,3) gives

F(q)=∑j≥0qjRj(q),Rj(q)=(1−q2j+2)(1−q2j+4)(1−q)(1−q2j+3)(1−q2j+5).(4)F(q)=\sum_{j\geq0}q^jR_j(q), \qquad R_j(q)= \frac{(1-q^{2j+2})(1-q^{2j+4})} {(1-q)(1-q^{2j+3})(1-q^{2j+5})}. \tag{4}

The factor qjq^j is essential: without it, the infinite sum would not define a formal power series. For a=2j+2a=2j+2, source Lemma 5.3 gives the partial-fraction identity

q3Rj(q)=q1−q−q2(1+q)(1−qa+1)−q1−qa+3−q3(1+q)(1−qa+3).(5)q^3R_j(q) =\frac{q}{1-q} -\frac{q^2}{(1+q)(1-q^{a+1})} -\frac{q}{1-q^{a+3}} -\frac{q^3}{(1+q)(1-q^{a+3})}. \tag{5}

Multiplication by qjq^j and summation yield

q3F(q)=q(1−q)2−L1(q)+L3(q)1+q−L2(q),(6)q^3F(q) =\frac{q}{(1-q)^2} -\frac{L_1(q)+L_3(q)}{1+q} -L_2(q), \tag{6}

where

L1(q)=∑j≥0qj+21−q2j+3,L2(q)=∑j≥0qj+11−q2j+5,L3(q)=∑j≥0qj+31−q2j+5.(7)\begin{aligned} L_1(q)&=\sum_{j\geq0}\frac{q^{j+2}}{1-q^{2j+3}},\\ L_2(q)&=\sum_{j\geq0}\frac{q^{j+1}}{1-q^{2j+5}},\\ L_3(q)&=\sum_{j\geq0}\frac{q^{j+3}}{1-q^{2j+5}}. \end{aligned} \tag{7}

2. Divisor formulas and a square-root bound

Let τ(N)\tau(N) denote the number of positive divisors of NN, and put ℓi(M)=[qM]Li(q)\ell_i(M)=[q^M]L_i(q). For every M≥1M\geq1, factoring the corresponding odd integers gives

ℓ1(M)=τ(2M−1)−1,ℓ3(M)=τ(2M−1)−1−13∣(2M−1),ℓ2(M)=τ(2M+3)−1−13∣M.(8)\begin{aligned} \ell_1(M) &=\tau(2M-1)-1,\\ \ell_3(M) &=\tau(2M-1)-1-\mathbf 1_{3\mid(2M-1)},\\ \ell_2(M) &=\tau(2M+3)-1-\mathbf 1_{3\mid M}. \end{aligned} \tag{8}

Indeed, the first two progressions in question correspond to factorizations

2M−1=(2j+3)(2t+1),2M−1=(2j+5)(2t+1),(9)2M-1=(2j+3)(2t+1), \qquad 2M-1=(2j+5)(2t+1), \tag{9}

respectively, while the third corresponds to

2M+3=(2j+5)(2t+1),j,t≥0.(10)2M+3=(2j+5)(2t+1), \qquad j,t\geq0. \tag{10}

The excluded first factors are 11, and additionally 33 whenever it divides the relevant integer.

Set u0=0u_0=0. Equations (6) and (8) give the exact integer recurrences

uM=2τ(2M−1)−2−13∣(2M−1)−uM−1(M≥1),(11)u_M =2\tau(2M-1)-2-\mathbf 1_{3\mid(2M-1)}-u_{M-1} \qquad(M\geq1), \tag{11}

and, writing Fn=[qn]F(q)F_n=[q^n]F(q),

Fn=n+4−τ(2n+9)+13∣n−un+3(n≥0).(12)F_n =n+4-\tau(2n+9)+\mathbf 1_{3\mid n}-u_{n+3} \qquad(n\geq0). \tag{12}

To bound uMu_M, let χ4\chi_4 be the nonprincipal character modulo 44, and define

S(x)=∑d≤xχ4(d),A(X)=∑d≤Xχ4(d)τ(d).(13)S(x)=\sum_{d\leq x}\chi_4(d), \qquad A(X)=\sum_{d\leq X}\chi_4(d)\tau(d). \tag{13}

Because S(x)∈{0,1}S(x)\in\{0,1\} and χ4\chi_4 is completely multiplicative, the Dirichlet hyperbola identity gives

A(X)=2∑a≤Xχ4(a)S(Xa)−S(X)2.(14)A(X) =2\sum_{a\leq\sqrt X}\chi_4(a) S\left(\frac Xa\right) -S(\sqrt X)^2. \tag{14}

Only odd aa contribute. Consequently,

∣A(X)∣≤2⌈⌊X⌋2⌉+1≤X+2.(15)|A(X)| \leq 2\left\lceil\frac{\lfloor\sqrt X\rfloor}{2}\right\rceil+1 \leq\sqrt X+2. \tag{15}

Since

(−1)t=−χ4(2t−1),(16)(-1)^t=-\chi_4(2t-1), \tag{16}

the alternating sum of the divisor terms in (11) is, up to sign, 2A(2M−1)2A(2M-1). The constant terms contribute at most 22 in absolute value, and the terms with 3∣(2t−1)3\mid(2t-1) alternate because their indices differ by 33, so they contribute at most 11. Therefore

∣uM∣≤22M−1+7(M≥1).(17)|u_M|\leq2\sqrt{2M-1}+7 \qquad(M\geq1). \tag{17}

Moreover, τ(N)≤2N\tau(N)\leq2\sqrt N. Combining (8), (12), and (17) yields

Fn≥n−3−22n+5−22n+9≥n−3−42n+9.(18)F_n \geq n-3-2\sqrt{2n+5}-2\sqrt{2n+9} \geq n-3-4\sqrt{2n+9}. \tag{18}

3. The triangular-number contribution

Gauss's triangular-number identity gives

H(q)=11−q2(∑s≥0qs(s+1)/2)2.(19)H(q) =\frac{1}{1-q^2} \left(\sum_{s\geq0}q^{s(s+1)/2}\right)^2. \tag{19}

Thus, with Ts=s(s+1)/2T_s=s(s+1)/2,

Hn=[qn]H(q)=#{(s,t)∈Z≥02:Ts+Tt≤n,Ts+Tt≡n(mod2)}.(20)H_n=[q^n]H(q) =\#\left\{(s,t)\in\mathbb Z_{\geq0}^2: T_s+T_t\leq n,\quad T_s+T_t\equiv n\pmod2 \right\}. \tag{20}

The substitution X=2s+1X=2s+1, Y=2t+1Y=2t+1 gives

X2+Y2≤8n+2,X2+Y2≡8n+2(mod16).(21)X^2+Y^2\leq8n+2, \qquad X^2+Y^2\equiv8n+2\pmod{16}. \tag{21}

Exactly eight of the sixteen odd residue pairs modulo 88 satisfy this congruence, for either parity of nn. Partition the first quadrant into half-open 8×88\times8 squares. Each contains exactly eight admissible points, and any square containing a point of norm at most R=8n+2R=\sqrt{8n+2} lies inside the quarter disk of radius R+82R+8\sqrt2. Comparing their areas and using π<22/7\pi<22/7 gives

Hn≤π32(8n+2+82)2<11n14+447n+1+71556.(22)\begin{aligned} H_n &\leq \frac{\pi}{32}\left(\sqrt{8n+2}+8\sqrt2\right)^2\\ &< \frac{11n}{14} +\frac{44}{7}\sqrt{n+1} +\frac{715}{56}. \end{aligned} \tag{22}

Combining (18) and (22), and using 2<10/7\sqrt2<10/7, shows that Fn>HnF_n>H_n whenever

12n−883>672n+5.(23)12n-883>672\sqrt{n+5}. \tag{23}

Indeed,

42n+9+447n+1<12n+5.(24)4\sqrt{2n+9} +\frac{44}{7}\sqrt{n+1} < 12\sqrt{n+5}. \tag{24}

For

P(n)=(12n−883)2−6722(n+5),(25)P(n)=(12n-883)^2-672^2(n+5), \tag{25}

direct evaluation gives

P(3286)=−137543,P(3287)=336193,(26)P(3286)=-137543, \qquad P(3287)=336193, \tag{26}

and

P(n+1)−P(n)=288n−472632>0(n≥3287).(27)P(n+1)-P(n)=288n-472632>0 \qquad(n\geq3287). \tag{27}

Since 12n−883>012n-883>0 in the same range, (23) follows for every n≥3287n\geq3287. Hence

D′(2,3,n)=Fn−Hn>0(n≥3287).(28)D'(2,3,n)=F_n-H_n>0 \qquad(n\geq3287). \tag{28}

4. Complete finite arithmetic certificate

The classical sum-of-two-squares formula gives

bn=#{(s,t)∈Z≥02:Ts+Tt=n}=∑d∣(4n+1)χ4(d).(29)b_n =\#\{(s,t)\in\mathbb Z_{\geq0}^2:T_s+T_t=n\} =\sum_{d\mid(4n+1)}\chi_4(d). \tag{29}

Indeed, bnb_n is one quarter of the number of signed representations of 8n+28n+2 as a sum of two squares, and its odd divisors are precisely the divisors of 4n+14n+1. Equation (19) now gives

H0=b0,H1=b1,Hn=bn+Hn−2(n≥2).(30)H_0=b_0, \qquad H_1=b_1, \qquad H_n=b_n+H_{n-2}\quad(n\geq2). \tag{30}

Thus (11), (12), (29), and (30) determine every coefficient using only ordinary divisor counts and the character χ4\chi_4. Put

dn=Fn−Hn.(31)d_n=F_n-H_n. \tag{31}

Exact evaluation over the entire remaining interval gives the following finite certificate; the final column provides an independent block-total check.

interval Imin⁡n∈Idn{n∈I:dn=min⁡k∈Idk}∑n∈Idn[0,9]00,1,2,3,4,5,7,83[10,10]−110−1[11,21]013,15,17,2022[22,22]−122−1[23,99]029790[100,199]9110,1122829[200,499]2922021146[500,999]9251577765[1000,1499]1961030131141[1500,1999]2951520184631[2000,2499]4072012238170[2500,2999]5202530291697[3000,3286]6173008,3010191600(32)\begin{array}{c|r|l|r} \text{interval }I & \min_{n\in I}d_n & \{n\in I:d_n=\min_{k\in I}d_k\} & \sum_{n\in I}d_n \\ \hline [0,9]&0&0,1,2,3,4,5,7,8&3\\ [10,10]&-1&10&-1\\ [11,21]&0&13,15,17,20&22\\ [22,22]&-1&22&-1\\ [23,99]&0&29&790\\ [100,199]&9&110,112&2829\\ [200,499]&29&220&21146\\ [500,999]&92&515&77765\\ [1000,1499]&196&1030&131141\\ [1500,1999]&295&1520&184631\\ [2000,2499]&407&2012&238170\\ [2500,2999]&520&2530&291697\\ [3000,3286]&617&3008,3010&191600 \end{array} \tag{32}

The intervals in (32) partition all integers from 00 through 32863286. The only negative entries occur at n=10n=10 and n=22n=22, and in both cases the exact coefficient is −1-1. Combining this complete finite certificate with the unconditional infinite-range inequality (28) proves (1).