The Feynman-period characterization of Speyer's invariant

A graph is cyclically 66-connected if it is 44-regular and has no 44-edge cut other than one isolating a vertex; cyclically 44-connected 33-regular graphs are defined analogously. For such a graph GG, let P~(G)\widetilde{\mathcal{P}}(G) denote its Feynman period after deleting any vertex, and let N2(G)\mathsf{N}_2(G) be the second Speyer invariant.

Period--Speyer conjecture. If two cyclically 66-connected 44-regular graphs, or two cyclically 44-connected 33-regular graphs, satisfy

P~(G1)=P~(G2),\widetilde{\mathcal{P}}(G_1)=\widetilde{\mathcal{P}}(G_2),

then

N2(G1)=N2(G2).\mathsf{N}_2(G_1)=\mathsf{N}_2(G_2).

This would make N2\mathsf{N}_2 a function of the Feynman period on these graph classes. It is supported by all graphs with known periods but remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Erik Panzer, “Graph theoretic properties of Speyer's matroid polynomial g_M(t)”, arXiv:2506.18788 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.