Unimodal and anti-unimodal atom positivity conjecture for flagged LLT polynomials

Let ν,σ{\boldsymbol\nu},\sigma be any flagged LLT indexing data, and let Gν,σ[x1,,xl;t]\mathcal G_{{\boldsymbol\nu},\sigma}[x_1,\ldots,x_l;t] be the associated flagged LLT polynomial. If

Gν,σ[x1,,xl;t]=λaλ(t)Aλ(x),\mathcal G_{{\boldsymbol\nu},\sigma}[x_1,\ldots,x_l;t]=\sum_{\lambda}a_\lambda(t)\mathcal A_\lambda(x),

then aλ(t)=Aλ(x)Gν,σ[x1,,xl;t]a_\lambda(t)=\langle\mathcal A_\lambda(x)\rangle\mathcal G_{{\boldsymbol\nu},\sigma}[x_1,\ldots,x_l;t]. An index is unimodal if it is weakly increasing and then weakly decreasing, and anti-unimodal if it is weakly decreasing and then weakly increasing. Unimodal and anti-unimodal atom positivity conjecture. For every flagged LLT indexing datum, aλ(t)N[t]a_\lambda(t)\in\mathbb N[t] whenever λ\lambda is unimodal or anti-unimodal.

This conjecture gives another extension of symmetric LLT Schur positivity. The source provides no resolution, so it remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jonah Blasiak, Mark Haiman, Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun and George H. Seelinger, “Flagged LLT polynomials, nonsymmetric plethysm, and nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials”, arXiv:2506.09015 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.