Equivariant Coxeter-complex surjection conjecture for the superspace coinvariant ring

Let WW be a finite reflection group of rank nn, let RW(11)R^{(1\mid1)}_W be its superspace coinvariant-type quotient, and let OPW\mathcal{OP}_W be the Coxeter complex formed by the faces cut out on a sphere by the reflecting hyperplanes. Write OPW,k\mathcal{OP}_{W,k} for its kk-dimensional faces, let R[OPW]\mathbb{R}[\mathcal{OP}_W] and R[OPW,k]\mathbb{R}[\mathcal{OP}_{W,k}] be the corresponding permutation modules, and let det\det be the one-dimensional determinant representation of WW. Equivariant Coxeter-complex surjection conjecture. There exists a WW-equivariant surjection

RW(11)R[OPW]det,R^{(1\mid1)}_W\twoheadrightarrow\mathbb{R}[\mathcal{OP}_W]\otimes\det,

and, for every kk, there is a WW-equivariant surjection

(RW(11)),nkR[OPW,k]det.\bigl(R^{(1\mid1)}_W\bigr)_{*,n-k}\twoheadrightarrow\mathbb{R}[\mathcal{OP}_{W,k}]\otimes\det.

The conjecture proposes an equivariant refinement of the observed relationship between the fermionic Hilbert series and the reversed ff-vector of the Coxeter complex; the text notes agreement in several types but a discrepancy in type F4F_4, and leaves the asserted surjections open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Satoshi Murai, Brendon Rhoades and Andy Wilson, “A proof of the Fields Conjectures”, arXiv:2505.24027 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.