Sign conjecture for Steiner distance hyperdeterminants
Let be a tree on vertices, let be its order- Steiner distance hypermatrix, and write for if , if , and if .
Sign conjecture. For any tree on vertices,
when this quantity is nonzero.
The conjecture appears in earlier work and has been checked numerically for , , and . It is trivially true for and odd , and follows from Graham–Pollak when ; its general status is not established in the supplied text.
References
Primary source
Joshua Cooper and Zhibin Du, “Determinants of Steiner Distance Hypermatrices”, arXiv:2505.10501 (2025).
Additional references
2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2024–2025). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2403.02287.
Progress summary
An unverified posted proof claims to settle the sign conjecture for every tree and every order, while the latest published paper still leaves it open.
The conjecture asserts that the sign of the Steiner-distance hyperdeterminant of a tree is whenever it is nonzero. Cooper and Du’s 2025 paper proves related tree-independence of the determinant’s value, but explicitly retains this sign statement as an open conjecture.
Known results
- Trivial for and odd .
- Graham–Pollak proves the case .
- Cooper and Du prove the case for every .
- Numerical checks cover ; even and also give nonzero determinants.
Posted attempt (posted August 21, 2026)
A reader-written argument claims a complete proof for all and all trees when the determinant is nonzero, using edge-cut coordinates, separated gradient equations, and a resultant sign computation. The attempt has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture is proved only in the recorded special cases, while a complete posted proof claim is unverified.
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
Let be a tree on vertices, and let be its order- Steiner distance tensor, where . We prove that whenever ,
This settles the sign conjecture of Cooper–Du, Conjecture 1. The key is to use edge-cut coordinates: all but one of the gradient equations then separate into one-variable equations. Their nonreal solutions occur in conjugate pairs, while the unique real solution contributes a positive factor.
We use the cut identity from Cooper–Du, Theorem 2.1 and the normalized resultant and Poisson formula recalled in Zheng, Section 2, Theorems 2, 4 and 5. The known vanishing for odd order when , and the case for every order, are already recorded in Cooper–Du; the latter is their Proposition 4.1. Thus it suffices to prove the assertion for even and . For , every entry is zero.
Cut coordinates and normalization
Put and . Its entries count the edges of the smallest subtree containing the indexed vertices, with repetitions allowed. Write its associated form as
The symmetric tensor determinant used here is
with the normalization .
Root the tree at vertex , and order the other vertices so that descendants precede ancestors. For each nonroot vertex , let be the sum of over its rooted subtree, and set . The linear map
has a lower triangular matrix with diagonal entries all equal to . In particular, its determinant is .
An edge belongs to the subtree spanned by a tuple precisely when that tuple meets both sides of its cut. Summing over tuples therefore gives the known cut identity
where is expressed in the new coordinates. Its normalized gradient, in the variable order , consists of
and
Both the variable change and the corresponding inverse-transpose change of gradient equations have determinant . The composition rule for normalized homogeneous resultants consequently gives the exact equality
The order of the equations matches the order of the variables, including for the last variable .
The product and its sign
Because is even, is odd. At we have for , so these leading forms have no common nonzero zero. Their normalized resultant is
After setting , the first equations separate as , where
This polynomial has degree and distinct roots. Indeed, is not a root, and its roots are exactly
The denominators are nonzero because is odd, and distinct give distinct roots. Moreover, the only real root is : on the real line, the odd power map is injective, so forces .
Let be this root set. The affine common zeros of are exactly , each with multiplicity one: their Jacobian is diagonal with nonzero entries . Applying the Poisson formula in the last variable gives
Assume . Every factor in this product is then nonzero. Complex conjugation preserves and pairs each nonreal tuple with a distinct tuple . Since has real coefficients, each such pair contributes
There is just one real tuple, namely , and its factor is
Thus the entire product is positive. Since is odd, the prefactor has sign . Therefore
as required. Together with the previously established odd-order and two-vertex cases, this proves Conjecture 1 for every order and every tree whenever its Steiner distance hyperdeterminant is nonzero.