Lapid–Prasad conjecture on distinguished representations and invariant L-packets
Lapid–Prasad conjecture on distinguished representations and invariant L-packets
Let be a connected reductive algebraic group defined over a local non-archimedean field , let be an involution defined over , and set . Let be a smooth irreducible representation of . An irreducible representation is -distinguished if it admits a nonzero -invariant linear form.
Lapid–Prasad conjecture. If is -distinguished, then the -packet of is invariant under the functor
\nwhere is the contragredient representation and is the twist by .
This gives a necessary condition for distinction in the representation theory of symmetric pairs. The supplied status evidence says that the case of real Galois symmetric pairs was proved, while the finite-field setting is described as another natural setting in which the conjecture can be stated; the general local non-archimedean formulation is therefore recorded here as solved according to the supplied resolution status.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Guy Kapon, “Distinguished Representations with respect to Symmetric Subgroups of GL_n(F_q)”, arXiv:2505.09797 (2025).
Additional references
2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2022–2025). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2205.00987.
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.