Lapid–Prasad conjecture on distinguished representations and invariant L-packets

Let GG be a connected reductive algebraic group defined over a local non-archimedean field FF, let θ:GG\theta:G\rightarrow G be an involution defined over FF, and set H=GθH=G^{\theta}. Let π\pi be a smooth irreducible representation of G(F)G(F). An irreducible representation is HH-distinguished if it admits a nonzero HH-invariant linear form.

Lapid–Prasad conjecture. If π\pi is HH-distinguished, then the LL-packet of π\pi is invariant under the functor

ττ~θ,\tau\longmapsto \widetilde{\tau}^{\theta},

\nwhere τ~\widetilde{\tau} is the contragredient representation and τθ\tau^{\theta} is the twist by θ\theta.

This gives a necessary condition for distinction in the representation theory of symmetric pairs. The supplied status evidence says that the case of real Galois symmetric pairs was proved, while the finite-field setting is described as another natural setting in which the conjecture can be stated; the general local non-archimedean formulation is therefore recorded here as solved according to the supplied resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Guy Kapon, “Distinguished Representations with respect to Symmetric Subgroups of GL_n(F_q)”, arXiv:2505.09797 (2025).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2022–2025). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2205.00987.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.