The LinKaw*–Drop1 equality conjecture

About 1 year old · traced to

Let LinKaw∗\mathsf{LinKaw}^* and Drop1\mathsf{Drop1} be the two families of relations defined in the source, with

LinKaw∗=span⁡Q{(ϕ(w1∗w2)x)∗w3∣w1,w2∈yH, w3∈H≥2}.\mathsf{LinKaw}^*=\operatorname{span}_{\mathbb{Q}}\{(\phi(w_1\ast w_2)x)\ast w_3\mid w_1,w_2\in y\mathcal{H},\ w_3\in\mathcal{H}^{\geq 2}\}.

Here H\mathcal{H} is the source's word algebra and ϕ\phi, ∗\ast, xx, yy, and Drop1\mathsf{Drop1} have the definitions given there.

LinKaw–Drop1 conjecture.* Based on numerical experiments up to weight 1717,

LinKaw∗=Drop1.\mathsf{LinKaw}^*=\mathsf{Drop1}.

This is presented as an equality between two families of relations; its resolution is not given in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Minoru Hirose, Takumi Maesaka, Shin-ichiro Seki and Taiki Watanabe, “The Z-module of multiple zeta values is generated by ones for indices without ones”, arXiv:2505.07221 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.