Stationary-distribution approximation for lounge-from-queue systems

Let u u be the transition rate from the lounge to the queue, let β\beta satisfy

βν=η,\frac{\beta}{\nu}=\eta,

where η>0\eta>0 is constant, and let A=ημ/αA=\lfloor\eta\mu/\alpha\rfloor. For each u u, write π(ν)=(πq,l(ν))q,l{\bm \pi}^{(\nu)}=(\pi_{q,l}^{(\nu)})_{q,l} for the stationary distribution of the system with lounge functionality. Stationary-distribution approximation conjecture. As u0 u\to0 with β/ν=η\beta/\nu=\eta,

supπ(ν)π(0)0.\sup \left\|{\bm \pi}^{(\nu)}-{\bm \pi}^{(0)}\right\|\to0.

Thus, the system with positive transition rate u u is approximated by the system with u=0 u=0 and A=ημ/αA=\lfloor\eta\mu/\alpha\rfloor. The conjecture formalizes the observed improvement of the approximation as u u decreases in the regime where lounge waiting \times become very long while the comfort parameter β\beta decreases proportionally. No resolution or proof is supplied in the source.

Progress summary

Solved

An unverified posted attempt claims a complete proof, with stronger total-variation convergence and a linear error rate, but the conjecture is not independently confirmed.

The conjecture asserts that, under proportional scaling of the lounge-transition and comfort rates, the stationary law of the positive-rate system converges to that of the zero-rate approximation. It appears in work by Riya Sultana, Khushboo Agarwal, and Veeraruna Kavitha, first posted April 28, 2025.

Posted attempt

A reader-written argument claims a complete proof: the total population is identified with an M/M/1M/M/1 chain, tightness and limiting balance equations yield convergence, and a regenerative coupling allegedly gives total-variation distance O(ν)O(\nu). The attempt has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has a claimed but unverified proof; no independent verification is recorded, so the mathematical question remains unsettled.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Riya Sultana, Khushboo Agarwal and Veeraruna Kavitha, “Queue or lounge: strategic design for strategic customer”, arXiv:2504.19889 (2025).

Solutions 1

Proof

Proof, strengthened to total-variation convergence with an explicit linear rate.

Fix 0<λ<μ0<\lambda<\mu, put ρ=λ/μ\rho=\lambda/\mu, δ=μλ\delta=\mu-\lambda, and impose the source's scaling β=ην\beta=\eta\nu. Its thresholds are

A=ημα,Bν=δνA.A=\left\lfloor\frac{\eta\mu}{\alpha}\right\rfloor, \qquad B_\nu=\left\lceil\frac{\delta}{\nu}-A\right\rceil \longrightarrow\infty.

Write Qt,LtQ_t,L_t for the queue and lounge populations, and extend all stationary laws by zero to the common state space

S={(0,0)}{(q,l):q1, l0}.\mathsf S=\{(0,0)\}\cup\{(q,l):q\ge1,\ l\ge0\}.

The source's instantaneous-transfer assumption ensures that the server is busy whenever Nt=Qt+Lt>0N_t=Q_t+L_t>0. Therefore, for every ν0\nu\ge0, the total population NtN_t is exactly the same M/M/1M/M/1 birth–death chain, with birth rate λ\lambda and death rate μ\mu. In particular,

π(ν){Q+L=j}=(1ρ)ρj(j0, ν0).(1)\pi^{(\nu)}\{Q+L=j\}=(1-\rho)\rho^j \qquad(j\ge0,\ \nu\ge0). \tag{1}

All the stationary laws are consequently uniformly geometrically tight. On every fixed finite subset of S\mathsf S, eventually l<Bνl<B_\nu, and the generators converge because the only remaining differing transition has rate νl0\nu l\to0. Every subsequential limit therefore satisfies the limiting stationary balance equations. Regeneration at (0,0)(0,0) makes the limiting invariant probability unique, and (1) preserves all mass. Hence

π(ν)π(0)TV0.\|\pi^{(\nu)}-\pi^{(0)}\|_{\rm TV}\longrightarrow0.

A regenerative coupling gives a stronger quantitative conclusion. Use the same arrival and service clocks in both systems, so their total-population trajectories coincide. For one empty-to-empty cycle, let

IExp(λ),T=busy-period length,C=I+T,J=0TNsds,M=supsTNs.I\sim\operatorname{Exp}(\lambda),\qquad T=\text{busy-period length},\qquad C=I+T,\qquad J=\int_0^T N_s\,ds,\qquad M=\sup_{s\le T}N_s.

Before the two trajectories separate, a spontaneous transfer has rate νLsνNs\nu L_s\le\nu N_s; otherwise routing differs only when MBνM\ge B_\nu. Therefore the regenerative occupation formula and Cauchy–Schwarz give

dTV(π(ν),π(0))νE[CJ]+(EC2)1/2P(MBν)1/2EC.(2)d_{\rm TV}(\pi^{(\nu)},\pi^{(0)}) \le \frac{\nu\,\mathbb E[CJ] +(\mathbb EC^2)^{1/2} \mathbb P(M\ge B_\nu)^{1/2}} {\mathbb EC}. \tag{2}

Gambler's ruin for the busy excursion gives

P(MB)=(1ρ)ρB11ρBρB1.\mathbb P(M\ge B) =\frac{(1-\rho)\rho^{B-1}}{1-\rho^B} \le\rho^{B-1}.

The killed birth–death equations yield explicitly

EC=1λ+1δ,EC2=2λ2+2λδ+2μδ3,\mathbb EC=\frac1\lambda+\frac1\delta,\qquad \mathbb EC^2 =\frac2{\lambda^2} +\frac2{\lambda\delta} +\frac{2\mu}{\delta^3},

and

E[CJ]=μλδ2+2μ(λ+μ)δ4.\mathbb E[CJ] =\frac{\mu}{\lambda\delta^2} +\frac{2\mu(\lambda+\mu)}{\delta^4}.

Substitution into (2) proves

dTV(π(ν),π(0))ν ⁣(μλδ2+2μ(λ+μ)δ4)+(2λ2+2λδ+2μδ3)1/2ρ(Bν1)/21λ+1δ=O(ν).\boxed{ d_{\rm TV}(\pi^{(\nu)},\pi^{(0)}) \le \frac{ \nu\!\left( \frac{\mu}{\lambda\delta^2} +\frac{2\mu(\lambda+\mu)}{\delta^4} \right) + \left( \frac2{\lambda^2} +\frac2{\lambda\delta} +\frac{2\mu}{\delta^3} \right)^{1/2} \rho^{(B_\nu-1)/2} }{ \frac1\lambda+\frac1\delta } =O(\nu). }

Since the conjectured coordinatewise supremum is bounded by total variation, this proves the original claim and gives a strictly stronger norm and convergence rate.

Source: Sultana, Agarwal, and Kavitha, Queue or lounge: strategic design for strategic customer, Conjecture 1 and equations (7)–(8), https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19889 .

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·