abc conjecture for a Galois number field

About 1 year old · traced to

Let KK be a Galois number field and let α,β∈K\alpha,\beta\in K. Using the height HH and conductor NN defined in the source by

H(a1,a2,a3)=∏vmax⁡(∥a1∥v,∥a2∥v,∥a3∥v),H(a_1,a_2,a_3)=\prod_v\max(\lVert a_1\rVert_v,\lVert a_2\rVert_v,\lVert a_3\rVert_v),

and

N(a1,a2,a3)=∏p∈INm⁡K/Q(p)1/[K:Q],N(a_1,a_2,a_3)=\prod_{\mathfrak p\in I}\operatorname{Nm}_{K/\mathbb{Q}}(\mathfrak p)^{1/[K:\mathbb{Q}]},

where II is the finite set of normalized finite places at which the three normalized absolute values are not all 11, the ideal notation (α,β,α+β)(\alpha,\beta,\alpha+\beta) denotes the ideal generated by these elements.

The abc conjecture for a Galois number field. For every ϵ>0\epsilon>0,

H(α,β,α+β)≪ϵ,KN((α,β,α+β))1+ϵ.H(\alpha,\beta,\alpha+\beta)\ll_{\epsilon,K}N\left((\alpha,\beta,\alpha+\beta)\right)^{1+\epsilon}.

The source states that this conjecture is equivalent to Elkies' version of Vojta's abc conjecture for number fields. The supplied text gives no resolution status.

References

Primary source

Hester Graves and Benjamin Weiss, “The abc conjecture implies infinitely many non-Wieferich places for fixed bases in number fields”, arXiv:2503.19144 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.