abc conjecture for a Galois number field

Let KK be a Galois number field and let α,βK\alpha,\beta\in K. Using the height HH and conductor NN defined in the source by

H(a1,a2,a3)=vmax(a1v,a2v,a3v),H(a_1,a_2,a_3)=\prod_v\max(\lVert a_1\rVert_v,\lVert a_2\rVert_v,\lVert a_3\rVert_v),

and

N(a1,a2,a3)=pINmK/Q(p)1/[K:Q],N(a_1,a_2,a_3)=\prod_{\mathfrak p\in I}\operatorname{Nm}_{K/\mathbb{Q}}(\mathfrak p)^{1/[K:\mathbb{Q}]},

where II is the finite set of normalized finite places at which the three normalized absolute values are not all 11, the ideal notation (α,β,α+β)(\alpha,\beta,\alpha+\beta) denotes the ideal generated by these elements.

The abc conjecture for a Galois number field. For every ϵ>0\epsilon>0,

H(α,β,α+β)ϵ,KN((α,β,α+β))1+ϵ.H(\alpha,\beta,\alpha+\beta)\ll_{\epsilon,K}N\left((\alpha,\beta,\alpha+\beta)\right)^{1+\epsilon}.

The source states that this conjecture is equivalent to Elkies' version of Vojta's abc conjecture for number fields. The supplied text gives no resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Hester Graves and Benjamin Weiss, “The abc conjecture implies infinitely many non-Wieferich places for fixed bases in number fields”, arXiv:2503.19144 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.