Eventual periodicity of combinatorial zero mutable Laurent polynomial counts

About 1 year old · traced to

For positive integers a,ba,b, let ZMLPcomb(a,b)\textup{ZMLP}_{\textup{comb}}(a,b) be the combinatorially defined set of pairs of partitions used to characterize zero mutable Laurent polynomials on rectangular triangles.

Eventual-periodicity conjecture.

  1. For each a∈Na\in\mathbb N there exists b0∈Nb_0\in\mathbb N such that for all b≥b0b\geq b_0, the number ∣ZMLPcomb(a,b)∣|\textup{ZMLP}_{\textup{comb}}(a,b)| depends only on bb modulo aa.
  2. For each k∈Nk\in\mathbb N there exists a0∈Na_0\in\mathbb N such that for all a≥a0a\geq a_0, ∣ZMLPcomb(a,a+k)∣|\textup{ZMLP}_{\textup{comb}}(a,a+k)| depends only on aa modulo kk.

The conjecture is motivated by computed tables for large rectangular triangles. It predicts eventual modular periodicity of the combinatorial upper bound, not directly of the number of zero mutable Laurent polynomials; the supplied text gives no proof.

References

Primary source

Tim Gräfnitz, “Smoothings from zero mutable Laurent polynomials via log resolutions and divisorial extractions”, arXiv:2503.18661 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.