Recurrence conjecture for Eulerian magnitude homology of path trees

About 1 year old · traced to

For n≥0n\geq 0, let Pn=([n]0,{{i,i+1}i∈[n−1]0})P_n=([n]_0,\{\{i,i+1\}_{i\in[n-1]_0}\}) be the path tree on the vertices [n]0[n]_0, and let EMHk,ℓ(Pn)EMH_{k,\ell}(P_n) denote its Eulerian magnitude homology groups.

Path-tree recurrence conjecture. For 0≤k≤n0\leq k\leq n and all ℓ≥0\ell\geq 0,

rank⁡(EMHk,ℓ(Pn))=(n−k+1)rank⁡(EMHk,ℓ(Pk)).\operatorname{rank}(EMH_{k,\ell}(P_n))=(n-k+1)\operatorname{rank}(EMH_{k,\ell}(P_k)).

This recurrence was observed while computing Eulerian magnitude homology for star trees. Its status is open, and it gives a proposed reduction of the ranks for arbitrary path trees to those for PkP_k.

References

Primary source

Patrick Martin and Radmila Sazdanovic, “Torsion in Magnitude homology theories”, arXiv:2503.11976 (2025).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

The conjecture remains unverified, but a reader has posted a purported complete proof claiming a stronger integral decomposition and torsion-freeness.

Martin and Sazdanovic recorded the recurrence as Conjecture 8.2 in 2025, based on computations for path trees. It predicts that the ranks for PnP_n are (n−k+1)(n-k+1) times those for PkP_k in every allowed bidegree.

Posted attempt

A posted attempt claims a complete proof: the chain complex splits by turning frames, each frame contributes only in the degree given by its interval span, and translation of the n−k+1n-k+1 possible spans yields an integral direct-sum decomposition, with all groups free abelian. The argument has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The recurrence is established only as a conjecture in the published source, while a stronger complete-proof claim has been posted but remains unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

Complete proof, with an integral decomposition, torsion-freeness, and explicit initial ranks.

Martin–Sazdanović, arXiv:2503.11976, Conjecture 8.2, predicts

rank⁡EMHk,ℓ(Pn)=(n−k+1)rank⁡EMHk,ℓ(Pk),\operatorname{rank}EMH_{k,\ell}(P_n) =(n-k+1)\operatorname{rank}EMH_{k,\ell}(P_k),

where PnP_n has vertex set {0,…,n}\{0,\ldots,n\}. We prove the stronger integral statement

EMHk,ℓ(Pn;Z)≅⨁a=0n−kEMHk,ℓ(Pk;Z)\boxed{EMH_{k,\ell}(P_n;\mathbb Z) \cong \bigoplus_{a=0}^{n-k}EMH_{k,\ell}(P_k;\mathbb Z)}

for every n≥0n\ge0, 0≤k≤n0\le k\le n, and ℓ≥0\ell\ge0, and prove all these groups are free abelian.

An Eulerian magnitude jj-chain is an injective word w=(x0,…,xj)w=(x_0,\ldots,x_j) of length

L(w)=∑i=1j∣xi−xi−1∣.L(w)=\sum_{i=1}^{j}|x_i-x_{i-1}|.

Its differential deletes an interior letter xix_i exactly when

∣xi−1−xi∣+∣xi−xi+1∣=∣xi−1−xi+1∣,|x_{i-1}-x_i|+|x_i-x_{i+1}|=|x_{i-1}-x_{i+1}|,

equivalently, when xix_i lies strictly between its neighbors.

Define the turning frame F(w)F(w) to consist of the endpoints and all strict local extrema, in their original order. Every allowable deletion preserves both F(w)F(w) and its interval hull

[min⁡F(w),max⁡F(w)].[\min F(w),\max F(w)].

Thus the entire Eulerian chain complex splits as a direct sum over turning frames.

Fix a frame

F=(f0,…,fr),a=min⁡F,b=max⁡F,d=b−a.F=(f_0,\ldots,f_r),\qquad a=\min F,\qquad b=\max F,\qquad d=b-a.

For each nonframe vertex

v∈VF={a,…,b}∖{f0,…,fr},v\in V_F=\{a,\ldots,b\}\setminus\{f_0,\ldots,f_r\},

define the eligible-run set

Dv(F)={i∈{1,…,r}:min⁡(fi−1,fi)<v<max⁡(fi−1,fi)},mv=∣Dv(F)∣.D_v(F)=\left\{i\in\{1,\ldots,r\}: \min(f_{i-1},f_i)<v<\max(f_{i-1},f_i)\right\}, \qquad m_v=|D_v(F)|.

Every mv≥1m_v\ge1, since the successive frame segments cover the entire interval hull.

A word with frame FF independently either omits each v∈VFv\in V_F, or inserts it into exactly one of its mvm_v eligible runs. Once the choices are made, monotonicity uniquely orders the letters in each run. Hence the frame subcomplex is the shifted augmented simplicial chain complex of

KF=∗v∈VF Dv(F),K_F=\underset{v\in V_F}{\ast}\,D_v(F),

the join of discrete sets of cardinalities mvm_v.

For completeness, order inserted vertices first by run, then by the monotone order within each run. If SS is the inserted-vertex set, orient its simplex with the additional factor

ε(S)=(−1)∑v∈Si(v).\varepsilon(S)=(-1)^{\sum_{v\in S}i(v)}.

A vertex in run i(v)i(v) occurring after tt earlier inserted vertices has magnitude-boundary sign (−1)i(v)+t(-1)^{i(v)+t}, while its simplicial-boundary sign is (−1)t(-1)^t. Removing it changes ε\varepsilon by (−1)i(v)(-1)^{i(v)}, so this orientation intertwines the differentials integrally.

Each discrete set DvD_v has augmented complex

0⟶Zmv→(1,…,1)Z⟶0.0\longrightarrow\mathbb Z^{m_v} \xrightarrow{(1,\ldots,1)}\mathbb Z \longrightarrow0.

The integral Künneth theorem for joins therefore gives

H~s(KF;Z)≅{Z∏v∈VF(mv−1),s=∣VF∣−1,0,s≠∣VF∣−1.\widetilde H_s(K_F;\mathbb Z) \cong \begin{cases} \mathbb Z^{\prod_{v\in V_F}(m_v-1)},&s=|V_F|-1,\\ 0,&s\ne |V_F|-1. \end{cases}

Since ∣VF∣=d−r|V_F|=d-r, the corresponding frame homology is

Hj(CF;Z)≅{Z∏v∈VF(mv−1),j=d,0,j≠d.\boxed{ H_j(C_F;\mathbb Z)\cong \begin{cases} \mathbb Z^{\prod_{v\in V_F}(m_v-1)},&j=d,\\ 0,&j\ne d. \end{cases}}

If some mv=1m_v=1, the frame complex is acyclic. If VF=∅V_F=\varnothing, the empty product is one with the usual augmented degree-(−1)(-1) convention.

Thus a frame contributes to homological degree kk if and only if its interval hull has span kk. There are exactly

[0,k],[1,k+1],…,[n−k,n][0,k],[1,k+1],\ldots,[n-k,n]

such hulls in PnP_n, and translation identifies each corresponding frame subcomplex with the full-hull subcomplex of PkP_k. Summing these n−k+1n-k+1 identical contributions proves the claimed integral decomposition and the source’s rank recurrence simultaneously for every (n,k,ℓ)(n,k,\ell).

The argument also gives an explicit initial-rank formula:

rank⁡EMHk,ℓ(Pk)=∑F injective turning frame on {0,…,k}min⁡F=0, max⁡F=k, L(F)=ℓ ∏v∈{0,…,k}∖F(mv(F)−1).\boxed{ \operatorname{rank}EMH_{k,\ell}(P_k) = \sum_{\substack{ F\text{ injective turning frame on }\{0,\ldots,k\}\\ \min F=0,\ \max F=k,\ L(F)=\ell}} \ \prod_{v\in\{0,\ldots,k\}\setminus F} \bigl(m_v(F)-1\bigr).}

For k=0k=0, the unique singleton frame contributes Z\mathbb Z at length zero, and EMH0,0(Pn)=Zn+1EMH_{0,0}(P_n)=\mathbb Z^{n+1}, exactly as required.