Hopkins's low-degree conjecture for hypothesis testing
Consider asymptotic hypothesis-testing problems between probability measures and . For degree at most , define the low-degree advantage by
Here is the set of real polynomials of degree at most , and denotes total variation distance. An algorithm achieves strong detection if the sum of its type-I and type-II errors tends to zero, and achieves weak detection if that sum is bounded above by for some fixed . Hopkins's low-degree conjecture. For “natural” high-dimensional hypothesis-testing problems between and , the following statements hold: (1) if
as for some satisfying , then there exists a constant such that no algorithm with running time achieves strong detection between and ; and (2) if
under the same total-variation conditions, then there exists a constant such that no algorithm with running time achieves weak detection between and . The conjecture is a proposed bridge from low-degree polynomial analysis to computational lower bounds for natural high-dimensional testing problems. The source does not provide evidence resolving it in full generality.
References
Primary source
Zhangsong Li, “Computational Lower Bounds for Correlated Random Graphs via Algorithmic Contiguity”, arXiv:2502.09832 (2025).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.