Vanishing-mass limit for locally constrained IMD problems

Let p(1,)p\in(1,\infty) and tmax>0t_{\max}>0. For each natural number nn, let (k^n,μ^n)L(Ω;R+)2(\hat{k}_n,\hat{\mu}_n)\in L^\infty(\Omega;\mathbb{R}_+)^2 solve the (vp-IMD) problem, respectively the (sp-IMD) problem, with reference modulus E0,n=E0/nE_{0,n}=E_0/n and the additional local constraint. The vanishing-mass conjecture. After passage to a subsequence,

(nk^n,nμ^n)(k^,μ^)(n\hat{k}_n,n\hat{\mu}_n)\rightharpoonup(\hat{k},\hat{\mu})

weakly in Lp(Ω;R2)L^p(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^2), where (k^,μ^)(\hat{k},\hat{\mu}) solves the corresponding unmodified (vp-IMD) problem, respectively the unmodified (sp-IMD) problem. This predicts that rescaling the moduli compensates for the vanishing reference modulus and removes the effect of the local constraint in the limit. The paper describes the claim as heuristic and leaves a corresponding delicate Γ\Gamma-convergence analysis for future work.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Karol Bołbotowski, Sławomir Czarnecki and Tomasz Lewiński, “The Isotropic Material Design methods with the cost expressed by the L^p-norm”, arXiv:2502.03161 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.