Degree conjecture for general rank sequences
Let a recurrence have characteristic polynomial with distinct roots, without multiplicity, and let be the subgroup of relations between these roots. Write for the rank of the free part of the quotient group . Degree conjecture. The associated general rank sequence is eventually given by a polynomial of degree . This conjecture refines the broader claim that general rank sequences are eventually polynomial. The examples suggest that each independent relation lowers the degree, but the source supplies no proof or resolution status.
References
Primary source
Eric Rowland and Jesus Sistos Barron, “Complexity of powers of a constant-recursive sequence”, arXiv:2501.14643 (2025).
Progress summary
The conjecture remains unproved in the literature, while an unverified submitted argument claims to prove it.
Rowland and Sistos Barrón formulated the degree conjecture as Conjecture 6.2 in 2025: for distinct characteristic roots and relation subgroup , the general rank sequence should eventually be a polynomial of degree , where is the free rank of . The same paper presents this as a heuristic refinement of the broader eventual-polynomiality conjecture.
Known results
- The paper gives an example with eventual rank sequence ; its quotient has free rank , matching the predicted degree .
Community submission (unverified)
A submitted proof argues that the conjecture follows from a Hilbert-polynomial analysis of multinomial expansions, claims to handle torsion in , and proposes an extension to repeated characteristic roots. No independent verification is supplied.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture is published only as Conjecture 6.2; an unverified submitted proof claim is the only reported progress, so the problem remains open.
Sources
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
Hilbert-polynomial proof of the degree conjecture for general rank sequences
In Complexity of powers of a constant-recursive sequence, Eric Rowland and Jesús Sistos Barrón formulate Conjecture 6.2 for a recurrence whose characteristic roots are distinct and have no multiplicity. They predict that its general rank sequence is eventually polynomial of degree one less than the free rank of its group of homogeneous root relations. We prove this assertion, including torsion in the relation quotient, and then give the sharp extension that explains exactly what changes when characteristic roots are repeated.
Let the distinct characteristic roots be
These roots are nonzero because the source assumes that the constant coefficient of the minimal recurrence is nonzero. The relevant relation lattice consists only of relations between products containing the same total number of roots:
Put
Because every element of has coordinate sum zero, the total-degree homomorphism descends to
In particular, . The homogeneity requirement in (2) is essential: root products from different powers must not be identified.
Suppose first that every characteristic root is simple. Introduce algebraically independent nonzero coefficients over a characteristic-zero field containing the roots, and write the general exponential expression as
Any finite initial segment preceding the eventual recurrence does not affect its rank. The multinomial expansion of the th power is
For vectors with , their exponential roots coincide exactly when
For each such equivalence class, the coefficient in (6) is a sum of distinct monomials in the algebraically independent , with positive multinomial coefficients. It cannot vanish. Thus the source's general, no-cancellation rank is exactly
Indeed, distinct nonzero exponential roots are linearly independent, so the minimal characteristic polynomial of (6) has exactly one simple factor for each class in (8).
Let
The semigroup algebra has one formal basis element for each , with multiplication . By (4), it is a finitely generated standard graded algebra, generated by the degree-one elements . Its degree- component therefore satisfies
We next compute its dimension without assuming that is torsion-free. Write
where is finite and when is trivial. Consider the subalgebra
Every generator of is integral over , since
Consequently, is a finite integral extension of and
The group generated by is . Hence is an affine domain whose monomial localization is the Laurent polynomial algebra of this free group:
Therefore the fraction field of has transcendence degree . The dimension theorem for finitely generated domains now gives
Hilbert's theorem for standard graded algebras states that the Hilbert function of a nonzero algebra of dimension agrees, for all sufficiently large , with a polynomial of degree exactly . Applying this to (10) and (16) proves
This is precisely Conjecture 6.2 for all distinct simple characteristic roots, all homogeneous relation lattices, and arbitrary torsion in .
Sharp repeated-root extension. The source explicitly notes that its symbolic lattice does not record multiplicities. Suppose more generally that has multiplicity , and put
The corresponding term in the general exponential expression is , where . For algebraically independent polynomial coefficients, the degree of the coefficient belonging to a product class in the th power is exactly
There is no cancellation of the top-degree coefficient because the contributions from distinct exponent vectors contain distinct monomials in the independent leading coefficients. Since a polynomial coefficient of degree gives a characteristic root of multiplicity , the general rank becomes
Introduce the standard graded semigroup
For a fixed exponent vector , sums of the allowed second coordinates attain every integer from through . Taking the union over all vectors representing gives precisely . Therefore
If all , the generated group is . If some , then both and are generators, so their difference supplies and the generated group is all of . The same finite-integral-extension argument consequently yields the exact corrected degree law
This also explains the source's Example 4.4: for characteristic polynomial , one has , , and
Its degree is , not , because the simple-root hypothesis does not hold. The repeated-root extension also proves the general-sequence half of Conjecture 5.3, but only under the source's general, no-cancellation convention. Its separate assertion about particular sequences with exceptional coefficient cancellations remains unresolved.