Balanced-regime confinement and collapse conjecture for strongly coupled networks

Let Xn=(xi1n,,xipn)X^n=(x^n_{i_1},\cdots,x^n_{i_p}) be a vector composed of one representative neuron in each of the PP populations, and let

B={(μ1,,μP)M1(Rd)P: xpSupp(μp), q=1Pgp,qRdbp,q(xp,y)μq(dy)=0}\mathcal{B}=\{(\mu^1,\cdots,\mu^P)\in\mathcal{M}^1(\mathbb{R}^d)^P:\ \forall x_p\in\operatorname{Supp}(\mu^p),\ \sum_{q=1}^P g_{p,q}\int_{\mathbb{R}^d}b_{p,q}(x_p,y)\mu^q(dy)=0\}

be the balanced regime. The associated deterministic dynamics are

dxpdt=q=1Pgp,qRdbp,q(xp,y)μq(dy).\frac{dx_p}{dt}=\sum_{q=1}^{P}g_{p,q}\int_{\mathbb{R}^d}b_{p,q}(x_p,y)\mu_q(dy).

Balanced-regime confinement and collapse conjecture. If the set B\mathcal{B} is nonempty, there exist asymptotic solutions confined to the balanced regime for all times. Moreover, if B\mathcal{B} is attractive for the deterministic dynamical system, in the sense that solutions with initial conditions xp0x_p^0 near the support of μp\mu_p converge to that support, then even initial conditions outside B\mathcal{B} lead to collapse onto B\mathcal{B} at a timescale inversely proportional to γ(n)\gamma(n); that is, for any t>0t>0, P[XtnB]1\mathbb{P}[X^n_t\in\mathcal{B}]\to1 as nn\to\infty. This conjecture predicts whether divergent interactions produce confinement to, or rapid attraction toward, the zero-net-input manifold; its resolution depends on establishing asymptotic dynamics and stability for the strongly coupled network.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Cristobal Quininao and Jonathan Touboul, “Balanced Dynamics in Strongly Coupled Networks”, arXiv:2501.11769 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.