Unfairness-witness conjecture for symmetric two-mode mixtures

From papers

Let NN_- be the number operator of the relative mode of a two-mode system. Consider a state

Φ=iPiρiρi,\Phi=\sum_i P_i\rho_i\otimes\rho_i,

where each ρi0\rho_i\succeq0 is positive semidefinite, Pi0P_i\geq0, and iPi=1\sum_iP_i=1. Let λ[1,1]\lambda\in[-1,1].

Unfairness-witness conjecture. The following inequality holds:

Tr[ΦλN]Tr[ΦλN2N(N1)]Tr[ΦλN1N]2.\operatorname{Tr}[\Phi\lambda^{N_-}]\operatorname{Tr}[\Phi\lambda^{N_--2}N_-(N_--1)]\geq\operatorname{Tr}[\Phi\lambda^{N_--1}N_-]^2.

If true, the inequality gives a sufficient test for whether a two-mode state can be a convex combination of identical states in the two modes: violating it certifies that the distribution is “unfair,” although passing the test does not guarantee fairness. The conjecture is presented as preliminary numerical evidence and is open in the source.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Anaelle Hertz, Noah Lupu-Gladstein, Khabat Heshami and Aaron Z. Goldberg, “Equalities and inequalities from entanglement, loss, and beam splitters”, arXiv:2501.02047 (2025).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.