The polynomial-form conjecture for lucky spots in parking functions
Let be a positive integer and let be a positive integer. A lucky spot is a parking spot occupied by a car whose preferred spot is that spot. Let denote the polynomial appearing in the claimed formula, and let be a rational number. Lucky-spot enumeration conjecture. The number of parking functions where the -th spot is lucky has the form
where is a polynomial of degree with rational coefficients. In particular, the asymptotic probability that the -th spot is lucky is
The formulas are suggested by the explicitly computed cases ; the conjecture proposes a uniform polynomial form and corresponding asymptotic expression for every .
References
Primary source
Steve Butler, Kimberly Hadaway, Victoria Lenius, Preston Martens and Marshall Moats, “Lucky cars and lucky spots in parking functions”, arXiv:2412.07873 (2024).
Progress summary
The original authors verified only the first five cases, but a reader-posted argument now claims a complete proof for every spot; that argument has not been independently verified.
Butler, Hadaway, Lenius, Martens, and Moats introduced the conjecture in 2024, predicting a uniform polynomial correction for the number of parking functions with spot lucky and a corresponding limiting probability.
Known results
- Explicit formulas are given for .
- For , the correction polynomials have degrees , respectively.
- The corresponding limiting probabilities are reported as , , , , and .
- The general statement remains a conjecture in the stored primary source.
Posted attempt
A reader-posted argument claims a complete proof for every fixed , using exponential generating functions, a convolution decomposition, and coefficient extraction to produce and its degree. The attempt has not been independently verified, so it establishes only an unconfirmed resolution claim.
Current status (as of August 2026): the cases are established, while a posted but unverified argument claims the full conjecture for all ; no independent verification was retrieved.
Sources
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
A polynomial formula for every lucky parking spot
A parking function of length is a preference word for which all cars park: each car takes the first unoccupied spot at or to the right of its preference. A spot is lucky if its eventual occupant preferred that spot. Write for the number of parking functions in which spot is lucky.
We prove the polynomial-form conjecture for every fixed , not just the previously computed small values. More precisely, for each there is a polynomial of degree exactly such that, for every , on putting ,
Its leading coefficient is positive, and
The boundary is separate and immediate: spot is always lucky, so and one may take .
This proves Butler–Hadaway–Lenius–Martens–Moats, Conjecture 3.1, which is Conjecture 13 in the published paper. The partial-parking-function count used below is their Proposition 8. The new point is a uniform decomposition for arbitrary ; it also gives an explicit formula for and proves that its asserted degree cannot drop.
1. Words on a fixed initial segment
We will also run the parking procedure on arbitrary words with preferences in , allowing a car to leave if no spot is available. For a word of length , let count those in which spot becomes lucky, and let count those in which, in addition, all spots become occupied. Define the exponential generating functions
In particular, for .
Recall that cars can park successfully in spots in
ways, for , with value when . Here is the usual circular proof. Put spots on a circle. Every preference word parks all cars and leaves empty spots. Rotational symmetry implies that a prescribed spot is empty in the fraction of the words. If that prescribed spot is the last one, its remaining empty is equivalent to successful linear parking in the first spots.
Before spot first becomes occupied, no car can leave. If this first happens at arrival , the preceding cars have parked in the first spots, so there are possible prefixes. To make spot lucky, the next preference must be ; every later preference is unrestricted. Summing over gives
Set . Thus
where the polynomial recording the initial exceptions is
2. Decomposition at the last empty spot
For , put
This counts all successful partial parking words on the first spots.
Consider a word counted by but not by , and let be its last empty spot. No car preferred , and no car crossed it. The subsequence of preferences below is a successful partial parking word on spots. The subsequence above , after subtracting from its preferences, fills all spots and makes the last one lucky. Conversely, any two such subsequences may be interleaved, preserving their internal orders. Hence
The inverse of this convolution has a particularly simple form. Let be the formal series satisfying
Lagrange inversion gives, for ,
and
Thus the generating series of the is , and multiplication by inverts the preceding convolution. It follows that
Substituting the expression for yields
where
Consequently . Write .
3. Reinsert the preferences beyond spot
Return to and . Suppose exactly of the preferences are at most . Their subsequence must fill the first spots and make spot lucky, so it has possibilities. The remaining cars form a successful partial parking word on the last spots, with
possibilities. There are interleavings of these two subsequences.
To justify this separation, recall that success of a parking word is unchanged by permuting the cars; equivalently, if its preferences are sorted increasingly as , success means for all . Move the cars whose preferences exceed to the front, without changing either subsequence's internal order. They never affect the first spots. If they park successfully and the other subsequence fills the first spots, each excess car from that subsequence has preference at most and takes the next available spot beyond . All cars therefore park. Conversely, any successful full word has both properties. Moreover, the lucky status of spot depends only on the relative order of preferences at most , which this reordering preserves.
We obtain
For a formal series , define
Since has no coefficients below degree , the counting formula says exactly .
The exponential term of highest rate gives
All the other exponential terms in vanish under . Indeed, take and . Then
Here . With , the two relevant coefficients are equal:
Therefore .
Finally, for , write , with . Direct coefficient extraction gives
The term with vanishes. The desired formula follows with the explicit polynomial
Here as before. Every summand has degree at most . It remains to exclude cancellation of the leading terms.
4. Positive coefficients in the polynomial basis
We show that for . This will also give a direct finite formula for every coefficient needed above.
For , define the positive numbers
Since in this range, its exponential decomposition gives
We use the classical Abel identity, which in this notation is
For completeness, this identity follows from the same tree-series calculation. Let . Lagrange inversion gives
The exponential generating function in of the left side of Abel's identity is
because as formal series. Comparing coefficients proves the identity.
Using and splitting in the expression for now gives
For , each denominator lies strictly between and . Thus
which proves . Negative exponents occurring at or cause no problem: their bases are positive integers, so these are ordinary rational numbers.
Each polynomial is monic of degree . Hence has degree exactly , with positive rational leading coefficient
For example, the formula reproduces
5. The limiting probability
There are parking functions of length , by the circular count above with . For fixed ,
Since , division of the exact counting formula by gives the asserted limit. The count holds for every , including , and the separate case was established at the outset. This proves the entire polynomial-form conjecture.