Conjectures on secondary bifurcations for single-hump kernel perturbations
Conjectures on secondary bifurcations for single-hump kernel perturbations
Let be an admissible kernel perturbation supported in , with small. Consider parameters and the positive periodic steady state , where , continued from into . A single-hump perturbation has a positive maximum at the centre of its support and is negative towards the ends; an inverted single-hump perturbation has a negative minimum at the centre and is positive towards the ends. Single-hump kernel perturbation conjectures. For a single-hump perturbation, the continuation provides a unique positive periodic steady state for each and sufficiently large , with the structure described by the source's asymptotic formulas and a symmetric single hump on ; as decreases, it is expected to develop a symmetric two-hump form, whose separation induces a new localized central hump and a local secondary bifurcation as a fold in the primary branch. For an inverted single-hump perturbation, the continuation likewise provides a unique positive periodic steady state for each and sufficiently large , retaining its symmetric single-hump form and focusing toward a central spike as decreases, thereby inhibiting secondary bifurcations from the principal branch. These proposed extensions of the paper's analysis are not established in the source; the first mechanism is investigated numerically in the subsequent section.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
David John Needham and John Billingham, “The 1D nonlocal Fisher-KPP equation with a top hat kernel. Part 3. The effect of perturbations in the kernel”, arXiv:2411.15054 (2024).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.