The successive thick-hook reduction conjecture for classical W-algebras

Let g\mathfrak{g} be soN\mathfrak{so}_N or spN\mathfrak{sp}_N, and let

λ=(λ1m1λ2m2λm)\lambda=(\lambda_1^{m_1}\geq\lambda_2^{m_2}\geq\cdots\geq\lambda_\ell^{m_\ell})

be a partition parametrizing a nilpotent orbit, with mi{1,2}m_i\in\{1,2\} subject to the parity conditions for the relevant type. Define

Ni=N(m1λ1+m2λ2++miλi),λ^imi=[λimi,1Ni].N_i=N-(m_1\lambda_1+m_2\lambda_2+\cdots+m_i\lambda_i),\qquad \widehat{\lambda}_i^{m_i}=[\lambda_i^{m_i},1^{N_i}].

Let HOλ^imi0\mathrm{H}_{\mathbb{O}_{\widehat{\lambda}_i^{m_i}}}^0 be the corresponding BRST reduction. The successive thick-hook reduction conjecture. There is an isomorphism of vertex algebras

Wk(g,Oλ)HOλ^m0HOλ^1m10(Vk(g)).\mathcal{W}^\mathsf{k}(\mathfrak{g},\mathbb{O}_\lambda)\simeq \mathrm{H}_{\mathbb{O}_{\widehat{\lambda}_\ell^{m_\ell}}}^0\cdots \mathrm{H}_{\mathbb{O}_{\widehat{\lambda}_1^{m_1}}}^0(\mathcal{V}^\mathsf{k}(\mathfrak{g})).

The conjecture extends the successive hook-reduction proposal from type A to types B, C, and D; the general isomorphism is not established.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Justine Fasquel, Vladimir Kovalchuk and Shigenori Nakatsuka, “On Virasoro-type reductions and inverse Hamiltonian reductions for W-algebras and W_-algebras”, arXiv:2411.10694 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.