Functoriality conjecture for the span construction

Let (,2)(\infty,2)-categories have categories as objects, functors as 1-morphisms, and natural transformations as 2-morphisms. Consider the (,2)(\infty,2)-category whose objects are categories with pullbacks, whose 1-morphisms are functors preserving pullbacks, and whose 2-morphisms are cartesian natural transformations. For a category C\mathcal C with pullbacks, let Span(C)\operatorname{Span}(\mathcal C) denote its category of spans.

Span functoriality conjecture. The Span\operatorname{Span} construction underlies a limit-preserving (,2)(\infty,2)-functor from the (,2)(\infty,2)-category of categories with pullbacks, functors preserving pullbacks, and cartesian natural transformations to the (,2)(\infty,2)-category of categories.

The results establishing functoriality, composition of natural transformations, and extension of natural transformations provide a 22-categorical approximation to this conjecture, together with the equivalence Span(C×D)Span(C)×Span(D)\operatorname{Span}(\mathcal C\times\mathcal D)\equiv\operatorname{Span}(\mathcal C)\times\operatorname{Span}(\mathcal D). The conjectured higher-categorical, limit-preserving functoriality remains to be established.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Elies Harington and Samuel Mimram, “Polynomials in homotopy type theory as a Kleisli category”, arXiv:2411.09950 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.